Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity?
Although there is no mode of transportation more environmentally friendly than cycling, it is still not preferred in several regions. This essay will discuss some fundamental causes behind this issue and propose solutions to it.
There are some reasons responsible for this phenomenon, namely the lack of proper cycling infrastructure and the habits of people. Regarding the former, the traffic infrastructure of certain regions lacks designated lanes for cyclists while plagued by heavy traffic congestion. This can be exemplified by the case of Ho Chi Minh City, where streets are cramped with cars and motorbikes, meaning that cyclists may be reluctant to use bicycles as they may be at risk of traffic accidents when traveling alongside faster and larger vehicles. As for the second reason, people, especially urban residents, tend to opt for faster modes of transport like buses or cars due to the fact they need to prioritize their time and energy for work and other important activities. This is especially true for those living far away from their workplaces, as they are more likely to suffer from fatigue and burnout after a long commute.
However, there are some remedies that can increase the prevalence of cycling. Firstly, the government should invest more in traffic infrastructure and enhance the quality of roads to streamline cyclists' journeys. For instance, building roads in areas with rough terrains and installing cycle lanes will make people feel safer in using bicycles(,) as these roads minimize the risk of traffic collisions. For those accustomed to other modes of transport, authorities need to implement policies that incentivize them to use bicycles. For example, they can collaborate with corporations to support their staff by allowing flexible working hours and offering financial incentives to people who commute to work by bicycle(,) all of which make cycling a more comfortable and enjoyable activity that more people may choose to do.
In conclusion, the quality of the traffic system and people's habits can lead to the underutilization of cycling despite its environmental benefits. Nevertheless, we can alleviate this issue by adopting the aforementioned measures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Roy An | 95 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | Linh Nguyen Khanh | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jenny_6902 | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | hxyav | 61 | view |
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Major cities in the world are growing fast as well as their problems What are the problems that young people living in those cities are facing Suggest some solutions 89
- Pollution of rivers lakes and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect the environment What are the possible causes of water pollution and what effects does this have on animal life and human society 84
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 61
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... that incentivize them to use bicycles. For example, they can collaborate with corp...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, still, while, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40869565217 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98801920495 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0871324839 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.285714286 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123355145752 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478629699635 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499997550672 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090542194571 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431250275049 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.