Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Drivers have to pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is a great amount of traffic.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Drivers have to pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is a great amount of traffic.

Nowadays it's becoming more important for the government to reduce congestion in big cities, in order to enhance transportation system. Some people believe that government should give ticket to drivers who are in bumper-to-bumper traffic; however, others argue that it's the duty of the authority to control traffic; in fact, drivers are not the main reason for this problem. It's seems to me that, fining drivers is a wrong policy to control heavy traffic. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in this essay.

To begin with, there are some other reasons that cause a big backup. Indeed, traffic is a complex phenomenon and regular driver are just one creator of this phenomenon. For example, yesterday I was in stop-and-go traffic, it took me 50 minutes to get home when it usually takes only 15 minutes. In fact, number of driver was the same as the other days, but this time an accident was the origin of traffic jam. As the example clarifies, there are some other sources that cause traffic jam like reckless driver and rubberneckers, so it’s not fair all drivers cite in bumper-to-bumper traffic.

Furthermore, it’s duty of the government to control traffic. I mean individual is taxed for the services he or she receives in society and transportation is one of the services that government should provide. In other words, police can use its traffic camera to gather information and broadcast the traffic data in public media. This information will help persons to bypass the traffic-jam. Additionally, constructing more roads and also increasing the number of lanes will improve transportation. As aforementioned reasons explain, it’s advisable that government improve transportation system instead of just citing drivers, since giving tickets is not a logical solution for the problem of congestion.

To put in a nutshell, although some individuals believe, citing people for attending traffic jam will prevent big backup, I’m of the reason that this resolution is not justice. This because driver in general are not the main cause of congestion; moreover, government is responsible for stop-and-go traffic and should invest more on transportation system. If authority schedule different time for persons to attend their jobs; for example, students go at 7 a.m. to school and employee go at 8 a.m. to their work, then bumper-to-bumper traffic would less likely to happen. otherwise managing too many driver at the same time will be challenging.

Votes
Average: 8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-20 Newporteghale 73 view
2020-11-11 dr.samiaelwakil 86 view
2020-11-11 dr.samiaelwakil 86 view
2020-10-21 himanshu@23 76 view
2020-09-18 toefl1234 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user omidhldn :

Comments

and regular driver are just one creator of this phenomenon.
and regular drivers are just one creator of this phenomenon.

In fact, number of driver was the same as the other days,
In fact, the number of driver was the same as the other days,

it’s duty of the government to control traffic
it’s the duty of government to control the traffic

flaws:
This is like an introduction which can be removed:
To put in a nutshell, although some individuals believe, citing people for attending traffic jam will prevent big backup, I’m of the reason that this resolution is not justice.

No. of Words: 402 while No. of Different Words: 201

----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 402 350
No. of Characters: 2018 1500
No. of Different Words: 201 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.478 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.02 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.909 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 156 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.088 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.327 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.501 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.079 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5