Task 2 : Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others. What types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
Historical values has been faded away to make ways for cutting-edge building complex in these recent years. There is a proportion of people argue that not all kinds of ancient buildings are needed to be taken care of, the statement is true to some extent. However, I believe the advantages overshadow its demerits due to culture-oriented factors.
On the one hand, some buildings with long-standing history have a high possibility in causing severe damages for the citizens living in its vicinity. Since the infrastructure has been rustic for many years, which can be inevitably collapsed, it is crucial to conserve these building, especially the buildings that are imbued with prominent historical stories. Furthermore, the constructions and calculations made by people lived in the past are not well-assured due to the lack of knowledge with the use of primitive materials. This can be exemplified by the reconstruction of the Notre Dame Cathedral of Saigon, it is reported to pose a potential threats to the dwellers due to the acutely worn-out foundation.
In contrast, the preservation of certain old building can result in an enormous budget allocation. The government normally holds accountable for protecting the country’s heritage, however, this usually costs time and money to comprehensively conduct. Additionally, some buildings are even reincarnated which takes aways its pristine beauty and core values. In terms of other buildings that are not meticulously taken care of, the authority can receive tantrum from the local residents as the people perceived this act as a discrimination among areas in the country.
In conclusion, it is beneficial to fully focus on conservating more for certain building, especially historical buildings since it can mitigate the risk of damage for the local dwellers, however, this can be considered as a misunderstanding and lead to the dissension between people and the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...areas in the country. In conclusion, it is beneficial to fully focus on conse...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43046357616 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2844677816 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579470198675 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.2014580764 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235065306417 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838050104651 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690575722201 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138828864659 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406130149164 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.