People living in the twenti-first century have a better quality of life than people who live in previous centuries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In comtemporary society, it is generally believed that the development in a variety of aspects of the world has been facilitating the daily lives of people in the 21st century compares to ones’ of hundreds years ago. Personally, I totally concur with this statement.
On the one hand, the emergence of technological advancement has brought numerous breakthroughs to generate convenience for people’s life in the modern society. Firstly, the application of hi-tech devices produces significant productivity in education. To elaborate, various equipment such as projectors, speakers and computers are used in classrooms which enable teachers to deliver the lessons to students effectively with vivid illustrations when it comes to images or motion videos. As a result, these equipment are likely to engage them in the lesson resulting in a positive academic performance. Moreover, people residing in a modern era would find it unchallenging to have checkups when having health-related problems. To exemplify, hundreds of hospitals and clinics are established in metropolitan locations as well as small health centers in rural areas which allows patients to have immediate treatment instead of looking for natural remedies that are not recognized as effective. Therefore, the mortality rate might be reduced as people’s health conditions are well-followed as well as having proper therapies for emergencies.
On the other hand, those living in the past centuries tend to be healthier and happier because of the following reasons. First of all, they are less likely to get involved in respiratory diseases such as asthma or hypertension. Specifically, the ubiquity of industrial constructions including plants and factories was not as widespread as the present, which means the amount of carbon dioxide being released into the atmosphere was inconsiderable. Hence, the air quality back at that time seemed to be purer and people could have a stronger system of respiration. In addition to this, lives of hundred years ago might be more blissful without the interference of technology. This is because there were not much technological inventions such as smartphones or laptops for personal entertainment. Thus, they had no choice but to look for activities which they could have real-world interaction ranging from singing, dancing or even joining social activities.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that people in the twenty-first century have a more quality of life compared to those living in prior centuries because of having noticeable improvement in teaching techniques along with better health care services.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-16 | dann061006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | nguyen thanh sang | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | trikhung777 | 89 | view |
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom sweden italy and portugual between 1967 and 2007 73
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food 84
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom sweden italy and portugual between 1967 and 2007 73
- In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 499, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this equipment' or 'these equipments'?
Suggestion: this equipment; these equipments
...o images or motion videos. As a result, these equipment are likely to engage them in the lesson...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aving proper therapies for emergencies. On the other hand, those living in the p...
^^^
Line 3, column 958, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cing or even joining social activities. Taking everything into consideration, th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2255.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59553349876 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22910501327 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60794044665 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8822446105 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.647058824 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7058823529 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237680387224 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648672065482 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824042727491 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167516836069 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938187565233 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 78.4519038076 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 499, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this equipment' or 'these equipments'?
Suggestion: this equipment; these equipments
...o images or motion videos. As a result, these equipment are likely to engage them in the lesson...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aving proper therapies for emergencies. On the other hand, those living in the p...
^^^
Line 3, column 958, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cing or even joining social activities. Taking everything into consideration, th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2255.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59553349876 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22910501327 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60794044665 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8822446105 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.647058824 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7058823529 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237680387224 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648672065482 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824042727491 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167516836069 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938187565233 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 78.4519038076 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.