Modern day life has become quite uncertain nowadays and trusting anything at face value is a very risky thing to do. That is also the case for building or house that a person buys or rents to live in. As the prompt mentions, in several countries nowadays the citizens are more interested in knowing the history of the house or building they live in, and such a curiosity generates from the many types of uncertainties like earthquakes, land related disputes etc. As a result, people are taking several measures to ensure proper knowledge regarding this. The reasons for this curiosity and how a person can perform adequate research will be answered in the following sections.
First of all, natural disasters are more commonplace now than they were before. Earthquakes have always plagued Earth but now the problem has become more severe. For example: the South-East region of Asia, has recently become a hot-spot for tectonic plate activities and the entire region is at risk of being ravaged by a huge earthquake. Consequently, people looking to buy or rent new properties in this region have become wary about a house or building's resistance to earthquakes. This is completely normal, as buying or renting a house or apartment is a very big investment and requires planning very deep into the future. A future where natural disasters like earthquakes are accounted for.
Second of all, in underdeveloped countries disputes regarding the ownership of a land or property are situations which occur quite often and can get dangerous very quickly. For example: duping someone to steal their property is something very easily achieved in underdeveloped countries where corruption lives and breathes out in the open. As a result, renting or buying houses like these, is only inviting more trouble, as disputes can breakout anytime and the new people moving in might get caught in the crossfire. For that reason, people are becoming more and more cautious and want to be informed about everything there is to know about a house, building or land.
Last of all, to put someone's mind at ease regarding all the different uncertainties that may arise, proper research needs to be done. People must gather information and validate them from several sources to take an informed decision. For example: information regarding earthquake resistance of a house can be attained from the results of several tests that were done by the people in charge of construction of the building. Furthermore, to figure out if there are any disputes related to ownership of the land, people must talk to the locals or reach out the government authorities for concrete evidence.
To conclude, the trend mentioned in the prompt of people becoming more and more interested in finding out about the history of a building is quite normal for the reasons discussed above. If answers to the questions posed above can be gathered and verified, a proper decision can be taken to move forward with the house or building to live in.
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labeled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Cambridge 15 Test 1 Writing task 1 The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in give Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, may, regarding, second, so, for example, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2506.0 1615.20841683 155% => OK
No of words: 499.0 315.596192385 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02204408818 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74827324173 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490981963928 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 809.1 506.74238477 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.920736946 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7619047619 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46141674608 0.244688304435 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127728208452 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975946434517 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269322755627 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082581482458 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.