In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
College students prefer to study different mathematical and technical disciplines like medicine, engineering, sciences, economics, business as well as value oriented subjects like social sciences, literature, history and humanities. The purpose of specific discipline is unique. For example, an engineering degree indicates that a college graduate is qualified to be an engineer, a medical degree dictates a doctor in the making. On the other hand humanities degrees are in general value oriented. These degrees expose a student to knowledge that instills them with moral values and help develop a perspective on life. I agree with the recommendation that all the college students should be required to take courses based on poetry literature and mythology. Additionally, I think history, social sciences and other humanities courses can be added too.
Humanities and literature courses play the important role of exposing a student who is taking a technical or science oriented degree to the value oriented perspective on life. An engineering student can only learn how to build and repair. However, end of the day he will get a job and raise a family and live like any other humans. If he only has technical skills and not a rich value oriented perspective on life and society, he may find it difficult to fit in. In the workplace, one has to live harmoniously with everyone else. An appropriate perspective on the social life plays an important role in the harmony of the workplace which can be gained taking the said courses.
Additionally, there is an issue of professional ethics. If a doctor is not a moral person, he can end up in devious things violating the patient’s right and harming their health. It is pivotal to instill ethical values inside the scope of medical degree. I think exploring literature courses will expose one to humans and their struggles, making them connect with their patients ethically and more humanely.
If there is no moral values instilled in a huge portion of the population, we only get working robots that can act as a weapon of destruction and chaos. Everyone being unethical and abusing their power in the workplace will be highly degrading to the status of our society and it will collapse. The exploration of humanities and literature can play a pivotal role in preventing that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | Simone23456789 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Simone23456789 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | Fortune Quarshie | 50 | view |
- In order to become well rounded individuals all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry novels mythology and other types of imaginative literature Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 62
- GRE sample issue pool essay topic 53 Many important discoveries or creations are accidental it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agre 16
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, well, as to, for example, i think, in general, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10732984293 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92600020631 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507853403141 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4244278371 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.55 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139892828473 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423799460519 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668278130882 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769090237209 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555096860327 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, well, as to, for example, i think, in general, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10732984293 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92600020631 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507853403141 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4244278371 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.55 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139892828473 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423799460519 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668278130882 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769090237209 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555096860327 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.