In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology and other types of imaginative literature.
The statement posits that college students would become well-rounded individuals should they take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology and other types of imaginative literature. Although this sounds true from a surface level, I strongly disagree to the statement.
Firstly, the path to being a well-rounded individual isn’t only about reading books in literature. To become well-rounded means to have an idea of topics in every facet of life. This involves having an idea in history, finance and business, societal issues among others. For example, a student who studies any of these courses as their majors or primary programs is not well-rounded individuals than students who don’t study this. There is no proof of well-roundedness due to a student studying a program different than another. We can’t say because I studied literature in school, I am well-rounded that my friend who studied finance. That would be an absurd thought to have.
Secondly, some situations require hands-on experience to make one well-rounded. It is impossible to become well-rounded in knowing how to change a flat tire or cooking by reading the procedure from a book. For whatever knowledge the student will gain from reading, the experience can’t be compared to having a practical experience of the situation. There are myriads of instances that requires that one has practical experiences. This cannot be obtained from reading literature books.
To conclude, although it is agreed that reading makes one well-rounded, it isn’t enough to become well rounded from reading only books in imaginative literature. Students must read from a wide range of topics to consider themselves well-rounded. In addition to that, some topics or discourses require students to have practical experience for them to claim they are well-rounded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | Simone23456789 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Simone23456789 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | Fortune Quarshie | 50 | view |
- As a result of numerous consumer complaints of dizziness and nausea Promofoods requested that eightmillion cans of tuna be returned for testing last year Promofoods concluded that the cans did not after all contain chemicals that posed a health risk This 58
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 68
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 83
- In order to become well rounded individuals all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry novels mythology and other types of imaginative literature 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... a student studying a program different than another. We can’t say because I studied...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 287.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43205574913 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04315060082 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564459930314 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7810617251 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7058823529 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375825496353 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118809822662 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122191507063 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249003750373 0.150359130593 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10069118247 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.