Should long term job seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You should w

Essay topics:

Should long-term job seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 250 words.

There is no doubt that people who are government employees live their life to the fullest. Few peope argue that such people who receive benefits should be return to the community in terms of voluntary work. I agree with the statement and in this essay, I will give the reasons for my agreement along with the examples.

To commence with, if you are the central employee, you get many benefits. This is because they are considered as a givernment servant who works for the nation. The merits are free accomodation, health insurance, and travel-free state-wide. For instance, the railway employee gets free travel for entire family as a part of their relaxation. Even though they earn hefty salary, they get to enjoy their facilities. On the other hand the private employee cannot have the same. They have to pay for each service. In short, civilians do not get equal facility.

Furthermore, another reason to do noble cause can be that they are assured by job-security and retirement pensions, while the other have to purchase the private schemes. For example, the person has to buy health plan for his/her dependents. In recent times, cracking a state job has become next level difficult. It can be considered as a nepotism which has created disparity among such groups. Also, to level such differences one should do noble work for the betterment of the society in returns.This will make a difference.

In my opinion, Although it is fair that government job seekers can earn benefits as they serve to the country, but they should give it back to the community as voluteers to compensate within the country and every citizen deserves such easiness.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-04 mehjabin 61 view
2023-10-04 mehjabin 67 view
2023-10-04 mehjabin 61 view
2023-10-04 mehjabin 61 view
2023-07-28 Nguyen Thi Minh An 78 view
Essays by user mehjabin :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
There is no doubt that people who are government employees live their life to...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'returned'?
Suggestion: returned
...h people who receive benefits should be return to the community in terms of voluntary ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with the examples. To commence with, if you are the central employee, you get...
^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...he betterment of the society in returns.This will make a difference. In my opinio...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in short, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95340501792 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67470941917 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.3628871981 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2941176471 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25598545085 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687675367221 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592295761135 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158935172958 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460955626267 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.