Only government action can solve housing shortages in big cities
to what extent do you agree or disagree?
it is argued that the high demand for housing in major urban settlements can only be addressed by the government. Personally, I think this is impossible as this social issue necessitates the joint effort of both the public and government.
One of main objections to government intervention is that it can hamper the private sector and pose a huge burden on the national budget. Such problem can be insurmountable in underdeveloped countries where budget constraints are persistent and homeless populations are fairly large. Consequently, the involvement of private property developers is required and recommended, which would otherwise not release the government from the burden of funding large-sized programs. Furthermore, given the role of private sector in regulating the relationship between supply and demand, they are considered an agent of fostering housing industry.
Despite such apparent benefits, governmental aid is essential in certain segments of market. It is obvious that single parents, the disabled and disadvantaged are those who cannot afford commercial housing. This indicates that they are in pressing need of governmental support in the form of housing allowance or even economical houses, albeit the success of such help programs resting much on the efficiency and willingness of both giving and receiving parties. However, it is not an overstatement to say that barring governmental assistance, a relatively considerable portion of society cannot have access to proper accommodation.
in conclusion, in dealing with inadequate housing, the cooperation between the government and private section is of the essence. While governmental help is of great use to low-income and vulnerable people in need of housing, the other can have a positive influence on the market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 89 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but other think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 90
- Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public 89
- People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than performers of classic music Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is argued that the high demand for hous...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ave access to proper accommodation. in conclusion, in dealing with inadequate ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, so, while, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.625 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25989974796 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1622804681 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0929246855965 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330091677894 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342796730998 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0555933866203 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257786524341 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is argued that the high demand for hous...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ave access to proper accommodation. in conclusion, in dealing with inadequate ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, so, while, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.625 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25989974796 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1622804681 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0929246855965 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330091677894 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342796730998 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0555933866203 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257786524341 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.