The provided circular charts illustrate the comparation of online trades of four different goods for retail sectors in Canada between 2005 and 2010. In general, it is clearly apparent that there were an increase in number of food and beverage and video games sales while the other two goods showed oppositely.
Looking in more detail from the charts, in 2005, the most popular goods that sold through online platforms were electronics and appliance at 35%. At the second place, home furnishings posed a quarter of the total sales in 2005. Slightly below, food and beverages and video games sold by 3% and 7%, respectively. However, in a lustrum, the online retail transaction of food and beverage rose significantly by 10% made it the most goods purchased in that year. Additionally, video games sales also increased by 5%. On the other hand, although it still nominated as the second highest sales, the online electronics and appliance transactions declined by 5%. finally, online home furnishing also dropped significantly at 15%.
- Public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free for people who use it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007 61
- Cheating in exams is one of the biggest problems in education What do you think about reasons for this Give some solution to solve the problem 61
- Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magzines to what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 656, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
... appliance transactions declined by 5%. finally, online home furnishing also dropped si...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hing also dropped significantly at 15%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, look, second, so, still, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76733866112 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5249569541 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4444444444 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188285928992 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762409107023 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563482809347 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162549252019 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416041625159 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.