Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Financing only predictable research is seeminly reasonably. As governments which have other conflicting priorities, they should consider returns of investments. However, I have a doubt that the result of scientific research can be predicted. Moreover, given that a research result can have various effects on related areas, I believe that governments have to fund adventurous research topics.
If some scienfitic research is “clear”, like speaker’s statement, what would be the meaning of the “clear”? It would mean that research results are predicted. However, in science area, the predictable research means that every scientist can think about the research and outcomes, and even easily copy the result. This is, the predictable research might be so easy that the result cannot make any significant beneficial impacts on a nation as well as a science society. Therefore, funding those research is just effortless.
I believe the unpredictability is a nature of science itself. Any meaningful scientific research have to risk the failure of the idea. Nevertheness, this unpredictability is the main cause of a splendid success in the science field. Many might be aware of the stories that most of historical researh started from vague grounds with unexpected assumptions. Hence, governments which are eagar to promote scientific achievements have to consider somewhat unclear but potential research.
Additionaly, the nature of science, unpredictability of results, should be reconsiderd in terms of their additional effects on related fields. If governments think about only the myoptical results, none of them invests on space research which is apparently the story for future. Although space research itself seems to be only for science itself, the many outcomes are relevent to security of nations. For example, the research achievement of space probes are now used for developing long-ranged missile.
To sum up, I believe governments should fund somewhat unclear research. Only if a government were to want to create trivial results would it finance research which can generate clear, but meaningless, consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-03 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | shahajan999 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | georgez | 58 | view |
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 66
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 54
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
... splendid success in the science field. Many might be aware of the stories that most of hi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65015479876 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15731494708 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9406639891 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.25 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.15 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311049818613 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10495922244 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911400415437 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190914867496 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630266874962 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
... splendid success in the science field. Many might be aware of the stories that most of hi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65015479876 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15731494708 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9406639891 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.25 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.15 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311049818613 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10495922244 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911400415437 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190914867496 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630266874962 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.