The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar

I completely agree with the recommendation that the first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar. If we zoom in on the concept of self-knowledge, it can mean variety of things for different individuals, but the most common understanding is the 'knowing yourself as a person'. For knowing yourself, the very first step is to reject all the known things about yourself because only then you'll be able to learn more things and grow as an individual. In spiritual world, when a person is going through the journey of self-realization, he is asked to set aside preconceived notions of his self and start a journey anew.

However, this applies to all the fields and not just spiritual field. Suppose a woman is a classical dancer and wishes to learn the modern hip-hop style. Here, she'll have to forgo the previous knowledge of classical dance only then she'll be able to perfect the hip-hop style. No person can progress in the learning if he is obstinately attached to his familiar knowledge. At some point he needs to come out of that comfort zone and face the challenge of unknown. By competing the unknown, that person grows his aura of self-knowledge. The new challenges put forth by the destiny are to test the mettle of person and he can pass those tests just via facing them. Even ascetics who have renounced the material world, do so in the primary hope of facing new problems and solving them thereby increasing the field of their knowledge. Self-realization is connected with the hardships of embracing the unknown.

Self-knowledge however is not only for an individual. We can see this on a larger scale too. If a community wants to improve and move ahead, it has to forgo the concept of existing knowledge and start exploring new avenues to put their work into. The young people of that community should take risks and together step into the vast ocean of possibilities. Even as a nation, when the citizens want to a developed nation, they are the ones who need to step out and take the dive into the unknown ocean of opportunities. Thus, the recommendation can be applied to all the three levels.

But, one needs to understand that rejecting familiar doesn't mean forgetting the previous knowledge. More often than not, the previous knowledge is what helps in facing new tasks. Hence at the begining, we are actually helped by the prvious knowledge to make decisions on an unknown path. A learned skill never goes out of utility and hence it can be used in some other way.
With that I conclude that the recommendation is correct and we need to reject all the familiar things which cloud our mind before taking that giant leap of self-knowledge.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 397, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you'll
...things about yourself because only then youll be able to learn more things and grow a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: HELL[3]
Message: Did you mean 'she'll'?
Suggestion: she'll
...o learn the modern hip-hop style. Here, shell have to forgo the previous knowledge of...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: HELL[3]
Message: Did you mean 'she'll'?
Suggestion: she'll
... knowledge of classical dance only then shell be able to perfect the hip-hop style. N...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s to understand that rejecting familiar doesnt mean forgetting the previous knowledge....
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...edge is what helps in facing new tasks. Hence at the begining, we are actually helped...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78787878788 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86826511543 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506493506494 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3568481498 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1666666667 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301034349818 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835221492986 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13136168363 0.0758088955206 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170712134485 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097989473419 0.0667264976115 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.