The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.
The given line charts compare the train passenger count and the percentage of on-time trains compared to the set goal between 2000 and 2009.
Overall, it is apparent that the volume of train passengers increased despite some fluctuations. In addition, although the running time became more accurate over time, only half of the recorded years saw the trains’ punctuality higher than the target.
Regarding the passenger traffic, beginning at roughly 35 million users in the first year, it started to grow to over 40 million in the next three years, after which it returned to its initial figure. The number saw an upturn, reaching a peak at approximately 47 million in 2005 before marginally dropping and hovering at around 42 million from 2006 onwards.
In terms of the punctuality rate, the year 2000 saw a 3% lower than its set 95% goal. The accuracy rose progressively, reaching the required percentage in 2002. The percentage of on-time trains exceeded the target during the next two years before starting to decrease to only 92% in 2006. From that, the figures witnessed an upswing and hit its highest in 2008 and 2009 at 96%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-07 | tramy3805 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-07 | tramy3805 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-16 | phanhhh | 73 | view |
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 84
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- In some countries there are more young people choosing to enrol in work based training instead of attending university Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99476439791 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61071291695 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628272251309 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5811402901 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328180750555 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126764632281 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112137763474 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21696897402 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123003939514 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99476439791 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61071291695 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628272251309 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5811402901 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328180750555 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126764632281 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112137763474 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21696897402 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123003939514 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.