People in many countries are spending less time with their families What are the reasons and effects of this

Essay topics:

People in many countries are spending less time with their families. What are the reasons, and effects of this?

It is true that the quality time has declined for many households all over the world. This essay attempts to shed light on the underlying reasons of this tendency before elucidating the repercussions it will bring to families and societies as a whole.

There are a host of rationales attributed to the fact that individuals spend less time with their families. First and foremost, the more developed the society is, the more hectic people tend to be. This is because nowadays humans need to be occupied with their job in order to meet their living expenses in the decade of global inflation. Another driving factor that results in insufficient time for family members is the overuse of technology. This argument could be reinforced by the fact that many scientists have shown that individuals, especially the youth, spend a huge amount of time with their technology devices daily. They would prefer to scroll on the feeds on social media rather than communicate face-to-face with their spouse or children.

The growth of this tendency towards reducing family time however could bring serious repercussions to our community. Regarding the former, the relationships between family’s members will be loose because of the weak tide. Therefore, domestic violence and parenting arguments will rise in every household. Moreover, if children receive less attention from their parents or siblings, they might put themselves in jeopardy by getting toxic influences from bad friends or media consumption. This acts as a precursor to increased crime and violence.

In conclusion, the intense work schedules and heavy use of technology gadgets are to blame for the distance in domestic relationships, and this phenomenon has a variety of adverse implications on the globe.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-04 uyenmia 78 view
2023-10-01 tsln7607 73 view
2023-07-29 Nguyễn Văn Việt 92 view
2023-05-08 remienn 84 view
2022-11-20 hanhkatori2402 78 view
Essays by user uyenmia :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...d societies as a whole. There are a host of rationales attributed to the fact th...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, in conclusion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30960854093 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87214849287 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5148833483 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347115566659 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100364452131 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720247033593 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169909802094 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105897713163 0.056905535591 186% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.