Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Opinion is divided as to whether economic growth is of great help to the world or not. Although such development causes damage to different natural parts of the earth, it is the most effective way to address poverty and hunger.
the opponents of economic growth often point to the fact that the integrity of nature is impacted. Such idea is predicated on certain observations especially in developing country where the quality of soil and water has been deteriorated by the excessive use of concrete and damaging building methods, ultimately affecting the natural diversity. For example, the construction of new residential area means a huge network of infrastructure which requires the clearance of different floral species. As a result, other species which are reliant on these kinds of vegetation also disappear.
Despite the aforementioned drawbacks, we cannot afford to stop the economic growth as it is the most important way to alleviate poverty and hunger. It is obvious that developing countries often attract foreign investments into rural places where the majority of poor people are residing. Therefore, new businesses and industries have been established, with the result that more jobs have been generated and the average living standards have been augmented. This could not have been achieved without the construction of new business premises. However, to minimize the impact of economic development on the local environment, the government should hire environmentalists to participate in the designing and building process to ensure that the local nature will be least impacted. By doing so, we can ensure that the economic development will not occur at the expense of local nature.
In conclusion, although there is some natural damage accrued from economic activity, it is imperative to factor the well-being of local nature in the development of economy as it is the most prominent way to reduce poverty and hunger.
- some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than performers of classic music Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public 89
- some believe that countries around the world should have a moral obligation to help each other while others think it is unncessary because money is misused by the governments that receive it Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- The World of Work Is Rapidly Changing and Employees Cannot Depend On Having the Same Work or The Same Working Conditions for Life What Are the Causes and Ways to Prepare People to Work in The Future 95
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in modern society Some people think that it will improve people s lives in many ways Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth Discuss both opinions and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinion is divided as to whether economic growth is of great help to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e way to address poverty and hunger. the opponents of economic growth often poin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35947712418 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99120844322 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552287581699 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2022973272 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.153846154 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207455371682 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770986239722 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728896224883 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140145295224 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453450522538 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.