This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant
The graph illustrates the recycling rate from 1982 to 2010 of the four materials: paper and cardboard, glass containers, auminium cans, and plastics.
In general, paper and cardboard has the highest proportion, while plastics has the lowest. Second place and third place belong to glass containers and plastics respectively.
Paper and cardboard experiences an inconsistency in recycling throughout the whole period, starting with a rise from 1982 to 1986, which was soon followed by a decrease in the following years until 1990 when it finally rose again before steadily going down in 1994.
As for glass containers, though experiencing a decrease at the beginning, recycling rate starts to soar in 1990 and then gradually increases throughout the rest of the period.
Turning to the recycling rate of aluminium cans and plastics, while being at the bottom of the chart, both have a relatively stable rise in proportion, with that of the former starting to go up from 1986, and the latter 1990.
- In some countries young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard in their studies What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 89
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888 By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use To what ex 73
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education on Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relev 78
- This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the production of electricity using a system called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion OTEC Write a report for a university describing the information below 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, so, then, third, while, as for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23456790123 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84315385674 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.4170326213 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.333333333 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0983933059644 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508602255406 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626415954221 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610322706487 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063937003076 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.