1. More and more people are using computers and electric devices to access information; therefore, there is no need for printed books, magazines, and newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary global landscape, the inevitable use of digital mediums and the usage of computers for information storage has sparked a debate regarding the necessity of printed mediums and physical storage of information. I firmly disagree with this phenomenon, as printed media has its own unique value and satisfies the diverse needs of certain individuals.
Firstly, the tactile experience of reading a book and turning the pages provides sensory satisfaction. Many people like the smell of new books and pages which cannot be provided through digital forms. This experience and aspect is often overlooked while comparing the two information channels.
Secondly, the physical medium of information provides a long-lasting and reliable storage of information. Computers can malfunction, can cause loss of data, data corruption, or de-synchronization. These all technical challenges can lead to a significant loss of important information. Whereas, printed materials are safe, secure, and easily accessible. They are particularly important for storing information pertinent to cultural heritage, historical information, and literature of different countries.
Additionally, another big challenge with digital forums is their inaccessibility. Not everyone is privileged enough to have access to the computers. Hence, having only one channel for information will lead to deprivation for many who cannot afford to have these gadgets. Whereas, physical forms of information are readily and easily accessible everywhere in schools, colleges and libraries.
In conclusion, the importance of computers and advanced forms of medium for information viewability and storage is undeniable. Yet, the co-existence of digital and printed medium is essential. The inclusive value of printed newspapers and magazines cannot be denied and obsoleted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-01 | Amna Zeeshan | 73 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Amna Zeeshan | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-28 | dhaivat | 78 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people But some people say that young people can also be a leader Do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96603773585 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31584972225 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3589854494 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5882352941 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186469906551 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535498001942 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333013269853 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101394281433 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358229269408 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.05 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.