Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern era, it is undeniable that people have several choices, from personal needs to public demands. Some people may feel it would be a significant change because they have multiple choices, while others will have negative views or opinions about such development. Personally, I do believe that having too many options may not be a good change.
First and foremost, being faced with numerous choices can lead to confusion and indecision among individuals. It can be obviously seen that these days, in every aspect, people are forced to make decisions among numerous choices, which causes challenges to them as they do not know what option is the best one, and in some cases, they might give up since it is hard to select. Take an example from the case of when a person tends to purchase a new, updated smartphone. Surprisingly, when searching on the internet, one can find more than five existing mobile phone brands, such as Iphone, Samsung, Oppo, Bphone, etcetera. Consequently, this diversity causes a lot of confusion among people and makes them hard to choose a good and fit one, or, in the worst-case scenario, they might decide not to change their phone.
In addition, this change may cause some negative effects on resident’s health. With the development of information technology, everyone will have many more opportunities to reach different sources of information. As a result, some individuals strive to access numerous sources due to the fear of being outdated, commonly known as the fear of missing out (FOMO). The consequences of this condition may not manifest immediately, as it is a form of mental health issue. If a patient is in this situation for a long time, he might be depressed sooner or later owing to trying his best to gain more knowledge than others in the community.
To summarize, while it may be good to have several choices for every aspect, I fully see it is not a positive idea, at least in this era, to have numerous options, which may lead to confusion or harmful impacts on human mental health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- People eat more processed food than they did in the past Why is this What are the effects of this 73
- Some developing countries invite large foreign companies to open offices and factories in order to help their economy However others feel that foreign companies should be shut out and instead the government should help the local companies to contribute to 67
- Many animal species around the world are endangered and each year we lose more species as the remaining animals in a population die Discuss the possible causes of species loss and suggest some ways that we might be able to preserve some of these vanishing 66
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about the dangers of committing a crime Do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, so, while, at least, in addition, such as, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87679083095 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70324668334 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558739255014 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4119303395 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.571428571 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16295856785 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585380996883 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634873405759 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105288793422 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674078364363 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.