Modern technology has greatly influenced people’s ways of entertainment, making people less creative. Do you agree or disagree?
Modern technology has a significant impact on how people entertain themselves. It is assumed that technology stifles creativity in terms of entertaining activities. In my opinion, I agree with this statement due to several reasons.
Firstly, modern technology has a negative influence on individuals' inspiration to create diverse content for entertainment. The convenience of technology can result in people’s passive consumption of repetitive content. If people become familiar with this type of content, they will be unmotivated to develop new ideas for entertainment. Many people, for example, opt for TikTok for entertainment, where the algorithm tends to suggest repeated content. Therefore, users who are familiar with the repetition of uncreative content cannot have any inspiration to create a diversity of entertaining content.
Secondly, modern technology can make people lazier in terms of creativity, especially during entertaining times. Without the help of technology, people in the past could still create outdoor activities to entertain with friends such as hide and seek or tug of war. However, with the current advancement of technology such as the Internet, people are becoming lazier in diversifying ways of entertainment because they have too many options available. Thus, less effort is put into inventing new ideas as technology can be sufficient enough to entertain a person.
In conclusion, I believe that modern technology not only influences how people entertain, but also diminishes creative ability. The repetition of content and a large number of options provided by technology can lead to a loss of inspiration and efforts in inventing various ways of entertainment.
- The graph below shows that the percentage of Australian export to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 78
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 61
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household While the second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen or pencil What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or a negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... technology has a negative influence on individuals inspiration to create diverse content f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... ability. The repetition of content and a large number of options provided by technology can lead...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68359375 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25825040147 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58203125 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.669729483 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.928571429 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333379107503 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131877666239 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928227906285 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229432860208 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701436920462 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.