The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives some information about the number of people who consum fish and three various group of meat in a European country from 1979 and 2004.
It is obvious that in this country the grams per person per week of chicken was more than other kinds of meats and the grams of counsumption of fish located in the lowest place during this time. The Fish did not change a lot throughout the period, chicken has upward trend, and the other two kinds of meat has downward trend.
As can be seen, the people of this society eaten fish in all of these years and this food did not change a lot and has a fluctuation trend. The lamb declined more than 90 grams from 150 between 1979 and 2004, it is similar about beef, after a fall around 40 grams increased rapidly approximately 60 grams in 1984 and then had a fluctuated toward down during 2004 nearly 120 grams. By constrant the chicken increased slightly about 100 grams from 1979 to 2004.
As a result, the statistics show people in this European country like chicken more than other meats.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-05 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | baoquyen1906 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The working week should be shorter and workers should have longer weekend Do you agree or disagree 67
- The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'group' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'groups'.
Suggestion: groups
...eople who consum fish and three various group of meat in a European country from 1979...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an other kinds of meats and the grams of counsumption of fish located in the lowe...
^^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...roughout the period, chicken has upward trend, and the other two kinds of meat has do...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 321, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...he other two kinds of meat has downward trend. As can be seen, the people of this s...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...try like chicken more than other meats.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49738219895 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20823272513 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.1552259584 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190741934975 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970935083781 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701346591316 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135826976593 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729152334884 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'group' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'groups'.
Suggestion: groups
...eople who consum fish and three various group of meat in a European country from 1979...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an other kinds of meats and the grams of counsumption of fish located in the lowe...
^^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...roughout the period, chicken has upward trend, and the other two kinds of meat has do...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 321, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...he other two kinds of meat has downward trend. As can be seen, the people of this s...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...try like chicken more than other meats.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49738219895 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20823272513 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.1552259584 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190741934975 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970935083781 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701346591316 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135826976593 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729152334884 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.