company's top level authorities should should get their employees in decision making process? give example and show your view point.
There is a widespread concern about the role of employees in decision making process of any company. In my point of view it is quite necessary to involve your employees in authority panel when taking great initiative for a company because employees understand all the matters better than you in some fields. On the other hand some people argue that involvemnet of employees is not necessary as they do not know about the terms and conditions for a company's growth and prosperity in future.
However, the role of employees can never be undertaken as they are the building blocks of a company and their honesty and dedication with work can bring company's profile at the top of the market. If company's top level authorities will not consider their employees as their family then it would not only heartbroken for workers but also harmful for the well-being of any company.
Moreover, we can see an example of Suzuki car company, as they have established their business across the world, they have always given importance to their employees.
To conclude, in my view point the government of Australia is taking great initiative to educate its citizens. People are encouraged to follow rules and regulations of their companies to bring prosperity and effiency not only in their life but also for the well being of humanity and positive development of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-10 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
- Pros and cons of this era as it is full of inventions Discuss a invention 55
- Why do you think people go to the university 77
- People spend too much time at work and they seldom have time for their personal life Discuss the issue and support your answer with examples 85
- Universities are now offering qualification through distance learning what are benefits 55
- Voting is compulsory in some countries Do you agree this 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ns for a companys growth and prosperity in future. However, the role of employees can n...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95614035088 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71357632295 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570175438596 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.7556447502 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.9669160288 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271691540823 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114759334811 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505300856235 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145712614447 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604687073756 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.1260098522 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.