Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?
The idea that there are too much resources are dedicated to protect wild animals and birds is controversial. While it is undeniable that protect animals is a long-term and high-cost proccess, I believe that more money and effort should be put for this process.
On the one hand, wild animals and birds play a critical role in many our life’s aspects such as pest control, ecosystem and environment balance. Moreover, the existence of many economic industry like ecotourist or renewable energy mainly rely on them. For example, annually, the VietNam authority earns a huge profit from allowing tourist companies to organize tours for visitors tracking or biking around the Cat Tien national forests. In addition, the animal corpses when they die are valuable specimens for researching and museum displaying that help to educate our next generations about the natural diversity and enviroment protection. As a result, the benefit from protecting wild animals and birds is enormous that can outweight the initial costs.
On the other hand, a lot of species of animals are brought to the verge of extinction because of harmful human behaviours that many efforts from multi-industry is needed to interrupt the disappearance. As mentioned, wild animals have a critical part in maintaining ecosystem. When any kind of animals decrease, the effect not only happens to other animals but also the environment and humans living in that ecosystem. Furthermore, the imbalance in the food chain can bring negative benefits indirectly for human health. Wild birds, for instance, can control insects by eating them. The reduction of bird population can lead to an increase in pesticides used by farmers to remove insects.
In conclusion, because of the important impacts of wild animals on human and the environment, I think that there are more resources are needed to protect our future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-12 | Anh Thi | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | duchuynh | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-13 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-20 | TuronKuzibaev | 51 | view |
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before 84
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible 84
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The idea that there are too much resources are dedicated to protect wild...
^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... is a long-term and high-cost proccess, I believe that more money and effort shou...
^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...d animals on human and the environment, I think that there are more resources are...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2657807309 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83401751578 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591362126246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1367072249 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.214285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221052451291 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825381831861 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090146304448 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149498733916 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654128239313 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.