Numerous people are of the opinion that volunteer work for society should be a mandatory lesson in seniar school curriculums. I utterly concur with this viewpoint, which is clearly elucidated in my essays.
There are a large number of advantages for pupils when they take part in these voluntary activities. First of all, these youngsters can pick up their prowess and grasp, which help them possess more experience. For instance, once they join in protecting environment campaigns, they will have more understanding about their habitats and nature. By doing so, they can preserve well ambiance and other creatures which live near these students. The more voluntary activities they involve, the more skills and knowledge they can improve. Furthermore, when freshmans participate these projects, they also have more opportunities to work with their peers and make new friends, expanding social circle.
Secondly, these schemes don’t only enhance their knowledge and skills, but they also help freshmans have more chances to land a covetous job. Cos during they were joining these campaigns, they had exposure and amassed a great number of practical experience and soft skills, which is always required by large enterprises. In this day and age, they will be benefits if pupils have an interview with companies. Because employers will ask them questions about their experience, aptitudes, etc. The more experience you possess, the more chances of vocations you have. Moreover, these students are also paid high salary. These are reasons why voluntary projects ought to be compulsory in education.
In conclusion. I totally agree with this idea. Voluntary campaigns help pupils possess more skills, experience and grasp.
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The bar graph shows a comparison of the figures for tropical deforestation for the year 1990 and 2000 The pie chart indicates the causes of tropical deforestation during the period from 2000 to 2005 78
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ry lesson in seniar school curriculums. I utterly concur with this viewpoint, whi...
^
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rly elucidated in my essays. There are a large number of advantages for pupils when they take pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ompulsory in education. In conclusion. I totally agree with this idea. Voluntary...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43656716418 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70755432302 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1246599295 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7058823529 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0867104696981 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331514794499 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484336811509 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667922727642 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474791037912 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.