Should young people change unfair policies?
Concerning this matter, I stand on Paul’s side. One reason is that alteration of policies can promote innovation and change. Unfair and strict rules often stem from old ideas and systems. As representatives of new ideas and technologies, young people need to challenge tradition and innovate. By changing unfair rules, they can bring new ways of thinking and solutions to society, driving innovation and change. Young people have questioned unfair education policies, such as criticism of racial discrimination and academic exclusion laws, as well as initiatives to promote educational equity. They call on schools and institutions to provide more equitable educational opportunities through class action lawsuits or open letters. Despite the fact preventing trouble for adolescents Kelly states, it is unnecessary. The reasons why young people do not need rules to control them mainly include pursuing freedom and individuality, opposing traditional concepts, differences in family education methods, and changes in the social environment. Overall, it is sometimes necessary for young people to alter some rules.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-18 | Julie.Zhu | 60 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | 57454751 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | reeya kiran | 75 | view |
| 2021-09-13 | meliiw_amd | 90 | view |
| 2021-09-13 | hazrat | 90 | view |
- Should advertisements use sad or happy or both types of pictures when advertising for charity organizations 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage 3
- Explain how the lecture refutes the reason that the passage states about smart cars 85
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 80
- Independence or Not 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
Concerning this matter, I stand on Paul’s side. One reason is tha...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 43.0788530466 19% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 52.1666666667 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 1977.66487455 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 165.0 407.700716846 40% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78181818182 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 4.48103885553 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11997033256 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 212.727598566 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.709090909091 0.524837075471 135% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 618.680645161 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.808048629 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287341917403 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900757980771 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657941152539 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287341917403 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 58.1214874552 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 10.9000537634 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.01818996416 130% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.