Some people suggest that the government should spend money putting more works of art like paintings and statues into towns and cities to make them attractive places.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals contend that governments should allocate expenditures on decorating cities with more artistic works and statues to make those areas more luxurious. Personally, I partly agree with this school of thought due to the following elaborations.
There are some reasons for the notion that metropolitan areas can increasingly become attractive with statues and works of art. Admittedly, individuals often associate a fascinating destination with colorful and picturesque sites, beautifying the landscape. As the government invest more money in decorating metropolises with colourful paintings and unique statues, such areas can attract numerous international and domestic tourists. For instance, the capital of Vietnam refurbished several streets with ceramic paintings in 2010 to celebrate its 1000th anniversary of foundation, drawing the attention of substantial tourists across the globe and contributing to increased revenues for the city.
Nevertheless, there are other ways to make towns and cities more decorative and wonderful. Specifically, the government should divert the national budget to enhance the public transport system. As cities are equipped with an interconnected public transport network, commuting in a high-density metropolis has become easier than ever, facilitating the development of tourism and trade activities. China, for example, has developed to become the second world’s largest economy due to its priorities on building a modern public transport system and interconnected road network.
In conclusion, although some claim that paintings and statues can beautify cities and towns, I partly agree with this school of thought. The decoration of cities with such works of art can not remain permanently due to the effects of erratic weather changes. Only with long-term schemes, such as the construction of a subway or improving road infrastructure, can cities appear more attractive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-19 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
- Nowadays going internationally to learn has become a choice that a lot of students prefer Why What is its impact 61
- Some experts suppose that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- In many countries plastic containers have become more popular than ever They are used in many businesses for example food and drink industries Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The increase in the number of privately owned cars is having a negative impact on both our towns and the environment What can individuals and the government do to reduce this problem 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...those areas more luxurious. Personally, I partly agree with this school of though...
^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... statues can beautify cities and towns, I partly agree with this school of though...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18779560454 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582142857143 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.976262418 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.076923077 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207037307946 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832862830728 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705981116996 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136519193395 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446274707245 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.