The graph below gives information about computer possession by households in one European country between 1997 and 2011.
The line graph provides information about the percentage of computer ownership in each household during 1997-2011.
Overall, while the percentage of possessing two computers and more than three devices witnessed an upward trend during the period examined, the opposite trend can be seen in the percentage of no computers. Despite the stable fluctuations, the proportion of having one computer remained highest throughout the period given.
The proportion of possessing no computers remained highest at 48% in 1997, then it experienced a sharp decrease in the next 14 years to plunge to approximately 20% at the end of the period. Meanwhile, the percentage of owing two computers saw an opposite trend throughout the whole period, with a rise from 5 per cent to peak at about 28 per cent in the final year of the period.
Although the percentage of more than three computers saw a subtle increase from 0 per cent to peak at about 10 per cent in 2011, it remained the least favourable. On the contrary, the percentage of possessing one computer fluctuated at 45 per cent and remained the most preferable in the fourteenth-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | Tuan Harry | 67 | view |
- In numerous nations there is a growing trend for individuals to frequently discuss financial matters such as their earnings or expenditures in everyday conversation What are the reasons behind this phenomenon Is it advantageous or detrimental 78
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 84
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land Which solution is better 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05319148936 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00883338123 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505319148936 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6063648005 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199079441501 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118724503522 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978497652494 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16351592633 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110337601461 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.