The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditures. This money should be used for new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that restoring ancient buildings in urban areas is expensive and wasteful; therefore, the government should reallocate the national budget to constructing brand-new houses. From my perspective, I strongly oppose this viewpoint due to the following explanations.
The restoration and maintenance of architectural buildings whose age lasts for decades is significantly valuable to sustainable economic growth as they maintain various cultural values. Houses and apartment blocks built in the past often feature numerous cultural values and architectural diversities of the contemporary world, which can become famous tourist attractions if the refurbishment process is carried out under strict supervision and consultation of professional and skilful architects. Therefore, should the government allocate expenditures to redecorating the existing buildings, the tourism industry can boom and gain valuable profits. For instance, Vietnam has distributed its national budget to annual restoration projects of Hoi An ancient city, which has witnessed a steady rise in the number of international tourists, contributing to the exponential growth of the economy in the region. As a result, allocating the national budget to old buildings is necessary and beneficial to the economy.
Additionally, restoring old buildings is more economical than constructing new roads and houses. As the construction of new blocks and roads requires tons of iron, cement, and other construction materials whose prices are drastically erratic and expensive, some less affluent countries whose economies are sluggish and fragile may have to borrow foreign capital, putting their national budgets under significant financial pressure. Meanwhile, the restoration and maintenance of old buildings is more affordable since it requires fewer construction materials and consumes less time than the construction of new buildings, which helps the government steer clear of financial waste triggered by price violations of construction materials.
In conclusion, while some contend that restoring old buildings is a financial waste due to its limited applications in the current world, I strongly disagree with this school of thought. This is because the architectural diversity of old buildings can contribute to the boom of cultural tourism if the refurbishment process is commenced appropriately and in line with its existing unique cultural values.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree or disagree 75
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet What are the causes of this problem How could it be solved has been deleted 84
- In many parts of the world some famous people are considered as role models and they are having an increasing influence on the young Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Many people around the world use social media to keep in touch with other people and get the news Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 84
- More and more people today are leaving the countryside to urban areas Why is this happening Do you think it is a positive or negative development 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... brand-new houses. From my perspective, I strongly oppose this viewpoint due to t...
^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: APARTMENT-FLAT[1]
Message: This word is common for American English. Did you mean 'flat'?
Suggestion: flat
...ain various cultural values. Houses and apartment blocks built in the past often feature ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ited applications in the current world, I strongly disagree with this school of t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95726495726 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29331667048 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541310541311 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.5735864113 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.25 106.682146367 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213562387212 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835965686987 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449093113835 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127674306629 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00953871965793 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 13.0946893788 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.88 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.