Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about the news. However, others believe that they can learn the news more effectively through other media.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are ongoing arguments over the optimal medium for staying updated on current events, with some advocating for newspapers as the most effective way, while others contend that social networking sites offer superior efficacy. Although both viewpoints hold enormous advantages, I lean more towards the latter for the following reasons.
On the one hand, there are compelling reasons for the perspective that newspapers are the most effective way of accessing information. The rigorous editorial standards have allowed conventional presses to offer readers reliable sources of unfolding events, enriching their social background knowledge with a high level of reliability and credibility. The in-depth analysis is another reason for getting news updates in newspapers. New Scientist, for instance, has released numerous pieces of news on global warming to provide readers across the globe with insightful thoughts and perspectives on this environmental catastrophe. As a result, substantial individuals have well acknowledged the importance of environmental protection by neglecting habits that can pose severe threats to the environment.
On the other hand, the opponents of the previous perspective argue that accessing information on social platforms is more captivating. The dissemination of up-to-date information on social networking sites has become more appealing to readers due to the incorporation of numerous visual aids. Admittedly, these visual elements can provide readers with a multifaceted viewpoint, helping them gain a more profound understanding of current events. For example, due to the authentic graphics incorporated into videos created to report the severe consequences of Super Typhoon Yagi, many individuals have fully grasped its devastating destructions in the northern part of Vietnam, prompting them to take immediate action to help those impacted.
In conclusion, although both newspapers and alternative social media are advantageous to readers, I argue that social networking sites are more effective in updating the latest information. The incorporation of visual graphics into news has made readers comprehend news more easily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-12 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-11 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-24 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
- Some people think that children should aim to their best at what they doing Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 65
- Nowadays eating habits of people around the world are changing causing them many health problems including obesity Why do people tend to eat so badly What can be done to improve their eating habits 78
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 84
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people We can learn just as much from books films and the internet Do you agree or disagree 84
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...th viewpoints hold enormous advantages, I lean more towards the latter for the fo...
^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...cial media are advantageous to readers, I argue that social networking sites are ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95207667732 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16748310149 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584664536741 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4126555539 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.307692308 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152675250752 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05903623952 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424074416422 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105830260637 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460041450779 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.