The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates variations in the numbers of people participating for five distinct activities at one particular social center in Melbourne and Australia from 2000 to 2020.
It is noticeable that film clubs attracted the most participants over this period, while the numbers of participants of these five activities showed a different pattern.
As is shown in the chart, despite some fluctuations, the populirities of film clubs and martial arts remained almost the same as their beginning figures, at approximately 63 and 37, respectively. It's obvious that the number of people who chose a film club was by far the largest among these activities.
We can also see that the figure for table tennis increased dramatically from about 16 in 2000 to roughly 55 in 2000, particularly in the last decade. Similarly, musical performances surge from none in 2005 to just below 20 in 2000, while slowed down in the last five years.
By contrast, amateur dramatics was the only activity that received a decreasing popularity, rising moderately from around 25 in 2000 to a peak of nearly 28 in 2005, before declining to about 7 in 2020, which was even overnumbered by the figure for table tennis in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | LauraTing | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-06 | bassmodulators123 | 67 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | bassmodulators123 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-14 | dorae | 73 | view |
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which e result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 78
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 79
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 84
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05445544554 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96086373338 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638613861386 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.0281553381 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.857142857 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236615797033 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106035875812 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102419587533 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136810403755 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106620503041 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.