Some people think that as housing is a basic need for people, governments should provide free housing for everyone who cannot afford it.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The notion of free housing has always been in heated debate, particularly in the era of overpopulation. Some believe that it is the government's duty to offer houses to low-income individuals free of charge. I, however, do not completely agree as this plan may partly deal with certain social issues, it may trigger several problems.
Without a doubt, providing free access to houses to financially incapable citizens fosters sustainable development. Not only does it deal with homelessness but also reduces the financial burden on those who cannot afford it. Many young couples are struggling to own a house, which potentially increases stress among them. Once they are provided a living place to settle down, their living condition will significantly improve. Moreover, when houses become more accessible regardless of people’s incomes, it promotes social equality, narrowing the gap between social classes. Therefore, the government should take responsibility to ensure its citizens are housed.
Notwithstanding, the free-housing scheme could be perceived as impractical and impossible as it presents enormous challenges. In the contemporary world, house prices are constantly thriving, meaning the project requires huge financial resources. This results in increasing taxes and cuts in essential services such as traffic, education, and health care. More severely, this plan may provoke a sense of dependency and irresponsibility among residents who may take houses for granted and thus refuse to make efforts. As a consequence, not only does it fail to thoroughly tackle social issues but also leads to the national budget deficit which should have been invested in more urgent proposals such as energy deficiency, illiteracy, and environmental pollution. This also means that authorities should introduce financial packages to subsidize their citizens instead of completely assisting them.
All things considered, despite the short-term benefits it brings about, offering accommodation free of charge to underprivileged people needs to be taken into consideration to ensure that inhabitants have a place to live while maintaining government budgets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-07 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | oanhnth | 78 | view |
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart andgraph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began 11
- An American film actor John Wayne once said Tomorrow is important and precious How is it important for individuals and societies to think about the future than focusing on the present only 73
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking Therefore advertisements of certain foods should be banned in the same way as advertising of cigarettes is banned Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...population. Some believe that it is the governments duty to offer houses to low-income indi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... low-income individuals free of charge. I, however, do not completely agree as th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75625 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16863905131 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659375 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2401220459 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245247128188 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673550626863 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449566755693 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132805657129 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296752438443 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.