In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested about finding out the history of the house or the building the live in.
Why is this the case? How can people research this?
In many nations, it has become increasingly common for individuals to develop an interest in uncovering the history of their residence. This essay will discuss the main reasons, and there are many methods to do this.
There is one main cause of history discovery of dwelling property. It is to allow occupants to maintain the structure easily. This is because many buildings were erected decades or centuries ago, meaning that unless the dwellers are descendants or relatives of the original proprietors, they might have very little insight into the structural elements and related matters to the construction. Such internal aspects, while usually neglected, are vital as they differ from era to era and may no longer satisfy the safety regulations of modern buildings. Hence, gathering these priceless pieces of information could allow occupants, especially homeowners, to recalculate the applied loads, accurately perform structural analysis, and reinforce the structure if any defects are detected.
There are many ways to search information of one living location. Firstly, house data could be sought from licensed contractors. Documents related to the history of the house as well as internal and external components could be recorded in architects’ archives. If one person inquires legally about these articles of database, then they would be presented by the contractor responsible for constructing the house. Finally, municipal councils could be contacted for the history of the residence. All of the property detailed information, such as construction dates, names of owners and housing status should be kept. These pieces of information help the authorities to manage the building of one property effortlessly and effectively.
In conclusion, tracing the history of houses is caused by one main reason, and there are two primary ways to do this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- The three pictures below show different kinds of bridges Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows a method of shaping glass containers Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the population figures for 4 countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...acted for the history of the residence. All of the property detailed information, such as ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49128919861 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97103664123 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599303135889 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2864983693 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.066666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130839620394 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440641126982 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375899347087 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940075644421 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404573169807 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.