Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Science and technology provided so many things that make our life easier. New devices are added continuously in our life. Things which were considered luxury are necessity now. With this increasing number of services and devices, consumption of energy is increasing exponential. Author claims here that individual living in developed nations should go for sustainable lifestyle in order to reduce energy consumption. In my opinion this would be good step in the direction to protect our planet. But author claims that only developed nations' citizens should do it is little extreme to support.
The more we consume the energy, more will be the pollution if energy generated from non-renewable energy source. Our consumption of energy directly results in pollution which affects the global climate. For example, going to office by driving car directly creates air pollution. When we turn on our television it doesn't create pollution but the electricity through which it is on has alreaady created pollution by burning coal or other natural resources. So limiting our consumption is very much needed to stop the global climate changes.
Further, author contends that people living in developed nations should reduce energy consumption. It is true that energy consumption per capita of any developed country is too much higher than that of developing country like India or china or any other third world country but only appealing to the people of developed nations is not the answer. It is true that developed nations' citizen should control their consumption more compared to developing nations, but now practice should be such that all the people on this planet act against climate change. Consequences will affect not only developed nations but all. Rise in temperature is global not limited to any particular country.
However, living without a car or a mobile phone is difficult to imagine. We cannot live without electricity now. But solutions can be found such as carpooling or people should avoid driving car for one person and use the local transport instead. Government should invest in renewable energy generation projects abnd encourage it such as wind energy or solar energy.
In a conclusion, not only developed countries but all over people on the planet have to take steps in the direction of sustainable lifestyle. People in developed countries should try to reduce their energy consumption and citizens of developing countries should try not to increase the consumption further. Projects such as wind farms or solar energy farms should be encouraged so that pollution free energy available to the people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Jeet Thkaur | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | bhavna288 | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 60
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers. 50
- Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are 70
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth. 53
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 62
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'third', 'for example', 'such as', 'in my opinion', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.273318872017 0.238963963785 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.160520607375 0.154291517835 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0976138828633 0.0886310499679 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0672451193059 0.0506014161523 133% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0390455531453 0.0449626384858 87% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106290672451 0.123526278965 86% => OK
Participles: 0.0455531453362 0.0379742944744 120% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79925103517 2.82910677849 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0281995661605 0.0316879551592 89% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0014075125626 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.058568329718 0.0950106342287 62% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0325379609544 0.0245489744465 133% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0108459869848 0.0157978311181 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2650.0 2899.98275862 91% => OK
No of words: 419.0 478.390804598 88% => OK
Chars per words: 6.3245823389 6.0591788892 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.65681771538 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.45584725537 0.369966551584 123% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315035799523 0.285172536893 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.224343675418 0.207245337619 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.162291169451 0.136322040163 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79925103517 2.82910677849 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 234.298850575 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494033412888 0.492565540709 100% => OK
Word variations: 54.6626894364 56.8184620615 96% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 21.1264367816 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.4583333333 23.7468607788 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0816170185 62.0618507366 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.416666667 143.81877709 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4583333333 23.7468607788 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.375 0.728815259664 51% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.87931034483 102% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.71264367816 0% => OK
Readability: 48.9619132856 52.2641144681 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.59349593496 1.64547068916 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386174196668 0.39480681544 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108997343496 0.11556216369 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.076497694306 0.0736162880345 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.462412692744 0.531340600358 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143509386661 0.15197228837 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12337171658 0.158818324754 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774415442074 0.0851127212816 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.221280909809 0.388921930462 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0354492925814 0.0677916285025 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233274552999 0.28015025965 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499132774676 0.0610219844235 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.8591954023 147% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30459770115 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.96264367816 101% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.10632183908 74% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.93390804598 51% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.04597701149 131% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 15.0862068966 80% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 4.0 Out of 6