Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different sources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different sources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Submitted by lorencito on Fri, 05/27/2016 - 00:03

Nowadays, the information sometimes is globalized by the interest of the most powerful nations or companies. Moreover, you can find false information by looking for in the wrong places. Anyway, I thereby agree with the statement. A person, who is looking for information, needs to check different sources and assures that the bibliography is confidence. Finding wrong news or publicity that twists reality in order to draw customer is very common in the current world where information is power.

News distorted following the interest from the government, or publicity news responding the interest of companies for drawing clients are examples of twisted information. Sometimes politics lie to us in order to conserve the peace among the citizens. Also, the most powerful countries distort the reality to achieve his intentions, for example, causes to start war or to interfere in other countries. Besides, many companies are always throwing publicities to impose their products over the ones from their enemy companies. For example, we can find MetroPCS companies starting campaigns about the superiority of their network over other business like Boost or TMobile. Other example we can see it in publicities about medicament’s effect that a month later are deny by other supposedly better medicament from other company. Even if the information is not completely true this kind of announce draws a lot of unaware and bad-informed people.

Students are victims of this phenomenon too. Looking for information about history, we can find many versions of the same event. As a famous historian one time said, the history is made by the victorious side. Sometimes, we are informed about a fact in the history class and after that, on internet, we can find a different version. For these reasons, for working in a project we should be aware about the biography through we must develop the work and put it on the project as reference. It would not be a casualty a completely work based in wrong information because the source where we were looking for by was distorted. To evict this, is very useful to check in different sources, we must read other possible viewpoints and get our references.

To sum up, in order to get well-informed, people need to surf among various sources to assure the truthfulness of the information. Sadly, this one, can be twisted by alien interests.

Votes
Average: 8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2016-05-27 lorencito 80 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by user lorencito :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is sometimes
Nowadays, the information sometimes is globalized by the interest of the most ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'starting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: starting
...eve his intentions, for example, causes to start war or to interfere in other countries....
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 762, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'denied'.
Suggestion: denied
...icament’s effect that a month later are deny by other supposedly better medicament f...
^^^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('completely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('work') instead of another adjective.
...s reference. It would not be a casualty a completely work based in wrong information because the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble viewpoints and get our references. To sum up, in order to get well informed...
^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one, can be twisted by alien interests.
^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'anyway', 'besides', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'kind of', 'to sum up']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236781609195 0.229887763892 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.158620689655 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0827586206897 0.0866891130778 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0459770114943 0.046263068375 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0459770114943 0.0685040099705 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137931034483 0.118717715034 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0436781609195 0.0351676179071 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.83949441405 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.032183908046 0.0309702414327 104% => OK
Particles: 0.00229885057471 0.00188951952338 122% => OK
Determiners: 0.0965517241379 0.0887237588012 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0229885057471 0.0209618222197 110% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00689655172414 0.0139019557991 50% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2384.0 2387.08602151 100% => OK
No of words: 391.0 408.028673835 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09718670077 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.358056265985 0.338922669872 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.317135549872 0.251872472559 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.225063938619 0.174417080927 129% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.148337595908 0.112833075102 131% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83949441405 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537084398977 0.524397521467 102% => OK
Word variations: 60.2476147536 59.2087087015 102% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.619047619 20.5533526081 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8710445052 48.84282405 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.523809524 120.699889404 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.619047619 20.5533526081 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52380952381 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.54480286738 108% => OK
Readability: 50.3326026063 45.7405998639 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.66972477064 1.45489161554 115% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342382859211 0.300154397459 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.11819409162 0.103427244359 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0831446482188 0.0752933317313 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.4719916574 0.497263757937 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144997580965 0.151897553556 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119812115706 0.114077575197 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766917199131 0.0781384742642 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.366689037138 0.336927656856 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0786657037378 0.067059652881 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247410914346 0.210909579961 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392717883394 0.0618886996521 63% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.86379928315 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK

--------------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 24 Out of 30