The reading passage and professor both discuss the authenticity of evidences attributed to the migration of Edmontosaurus. The author contends that in order to survive in harsh arctic winter, Edmontosaurus needed to migrate south to more hospitable regions, stating three conspicuous reasons so as to support. However, the lecturer, having a critical point of view, casts a shadow of doubt on what the author proposes. She explains that the mentioned migration hypothesis in the article is unconvincing and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the author claims that since Edmontosaurus ate plants, they had to migrate to temprate zones to find food. On the contrary, the professor, not having been convinced, declares that they did not have to migrate for food. She proceeds to state that hundred million years ago, arctic climate was warmer than today. By that time, there was sun there 24 hours of a day during summers. Therefore, there was a good condition for plants to grow during summers. Moreover, in winters, plants would die, and there was plenty of dead plants there that Edmontosaurus could live on.
Second, the author posits that Edmontosaurus lived in herd, and like many moder-day migratory animals, they sould have migrated. The lecturer opposes this point, saying that living in herd does not support the migration hypothesis. To elucidate more on this issue, she explains that there other reasons that animals live in herd. One reason is that they can protect themselves in competitions. According to the professor, one kind of elk, which lives in the Western United States, and plants that also live in that region are good example of this.
Finally, the author highlights the fact that Edmontosaurus were physically able to migrate for long distances. On other hand, the professor states that this is not a good support of the migration hypothesis. She sheds some light on this premise, saying that all animals in herds were not adults. Nonetheless, young animals were not capable of migrating for long distances. We also learn that even though all herd wanted to migrate, young Edmontosaurus would slow down the pace of the movement. In addition, adult ones could not leave young Edmontosaurus behind since they could not survive. This facts are in contradition with the claim that Edmontosaurus could migrate really fast.
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 77
- TPO 31- Integrated Task 76
- TPO 30- Integrated Task 70
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ions, stating three conspicuous reasons so as to support. However, the lecturer, having ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...today. By that time, there was sun there 24 hours of a day during summers. Theref...
^^
Line 7, column 592, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...us behind since they could not survive. This facts are in contradition with the clai...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'as to', 'in addition', 'kind of', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.244239631336 0.261695866417 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.165898617512 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0599078341014 0.0723426182421 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0552995391705 0.0435111971325 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0253456221198 0.0277247811725 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140552995392 0.128828473217 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0253456221198 0.0370669169778 68% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71373938668 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0345622119816 0.0208969081088 165% => OK
Particles: 0.00230414746544 0.00154638098197 149% => OK
Determiners: 0.0967741935484 0.128158765124 76% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0161290322581 0.0158828679856 102% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00921658986175 0.0114777025283 80% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2359.0 1645.83664459 143% => OK
No of words: 382.0 271.125827815 141% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17539267016 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.04852973271 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.36387434555 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269633507853 0.287516216867 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183246073298 0.187439937562 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130890052356 0.113142543107 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71373938668 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 145.348785872 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531413612565 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 58.8340849289 53.8517498576 109% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0529801325 169% => OK
Sentence length: 17.3636363636 21.7502111507 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3866182561 49.3711431718 55% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.227272727 132.220823453 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 21.7502111507 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.878197800319 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 44.326987149 50.5018328374 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.66355140187 1.90840788429 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.612031727326 0.549887131256 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125677723961 0.142949733639 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0773024352252 0.0787303798458 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.502014004753 0.631733273073 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0881649933029 0.139662658121 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232115473774 0.266732575781 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112095725515 0.103435571967 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.383616161839 0.414875509568 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0619653658107 0.0530846634433 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.453286852664 0.40443939384 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059790431235 0.0528353158467 113% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.26048565121 211% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 3.1766004415 252% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 10.2958057395 194% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.