Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is an ongoing controversy argument that whether governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. Some people think that road is more suitable than railways. However, in my opinion, I believe that spending money on railways can make more benefit than use it for roads for several reasons.
First, train is the cheaper way to travel the car or bus. People should get the valuable public transport with the minimum cost and the government should provide the sufficient support for people. Because a train can carry more than hundred people, it is one of the most economical transportation. For instance, in my country, the train cost only 5 pounds to travel from Bangkok to Chiangmai, compared to the bus, which cost 12 pounds. Clearly, the train is the low-price transportation than road vehicle, so the governments should invest on railways more to ensure that people in their countries get the reasonable public transportation.
Second, the railways system emit less pollution than the other transport in road system. Nowadays, most cars still need oil to make to possible move. Consequently, the carbon was produce a lot from the car engines, damaging the environment and harming the living creatures. In contrast, there are the train innovations that use other clean energy, such as electricity, to propel the train instead of oil. This innovation can reduce significant level of environment problems that humans are now facing. So the government ought to persuade people to use this clean technology by promoting the railways, rather than the roads.
In conclusion, investing on railways contributes more benefits on roads. It brings the cheaper way of transportation and cause less pollution to the environment. I believe that the world would be better if the governments invest more on the railways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- Reading materialIn many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider rang 83
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications 66
- In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. Walk into the Heart's Delight, a store that started selling organic fruits and vegetables and whole-grain flours in the 1960's, 70
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...le. Because a train can carry more than hundred people, it is one of the most economica...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...e public transportation. Second, the railways system emit less pollution than the oth...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.287009063444 0.247107183377 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.123867069486 0.155533422707 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0845921450151 0.0946595960268 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.036253776435 0.0501214627716 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.02416918429 0.0437548338989 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.129909365559 0.122226691241 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0211480362538 0.0403226058552 52% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8571545943 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0332326283988 0.0326793684256 102% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.105740181269 0.0861772015684 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0271903323263 0.021408717616 127% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00604229607251 0.011925033212 51% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1831.0 1933.35771543 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 316.048096192 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.20677966102 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.393220338983 0.374742101984 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291525423729 0.28420135186 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.210169491525 0.203846283523 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135593220339 0.137316102897 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8571545943 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.037074148 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538983050847 0.56093040696 96% => OK
Word variations: 55.1214066337 60.7387585426 91% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.3529411765 20.7743622355 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8666310784 49.517814964 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.705882353 127.492653851 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7743622355 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.764705882353 0.814263465372 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 46.5054835494 49.1944974215 95% => OK
Elegance: 2.37704918033 1.69124875643 141% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18285728417 0.332605444948 55% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0882929309886 0.102741220458 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0616510716179 0.0668466124924 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.553853927121 0.534860350844 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.141855603735 0.148594505496 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872195359919 0.134430193775 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07572705514 0.0742795772207 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.368083778628 0.324371583561 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.152797920571 0.0638462369009 239% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148174504156 0.228012699653 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652637333556 0.058150111329 112% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.41683366733 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 1.9629258517 255% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.