Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
In todays's scenario, most of the states have very little amount vegetation remaining. Due, to this convservation of forests and other vegetation have received considerable momentum in the recent years. This effort of conservation would be further strengthened by passing of laws, which considerably help in preserving the remaining wilderness.
Most cities today are affected by the problems of poor quality of air, which not only makes breathing and living difficult, but, in addition causes a plethora of respiratory problems. This can be attributed to the fact that in these cities people were more concerned about the economic gain rather than preserving the wilderness. As a result, today most cities have reached to such a juncture that recovering the wilderness have become our topmost priority. This is because, the forests help in clearing the air of dust and moreover supply oxygen which is essential for the survival of human beings. Now, as we destroy the trees and other vegetation, we are basically depleting our supply of oxygen. Now, economic gain is useless when the very existence of human life is threatened. Thus, it is very much essential to preserve the wilderness as much as possible. Moreover, passing of laws by the nations will further aid in preservation of the natural vegetation.
Moreover, it is not true that economic gain can only be achieved by clearing wilderness and building structures. Various plants and trees from the wilderness are also responsible huge economic gains. A simple example would be Chincona tree, which is a medicinal plant found in the wild. It is very much useful in making anti-malarial medicines. Hence, these medicines not only give monetary benifit but also offers something even more priceless, i.e., ability to save the fellow human lives. Thus, clearing the vegetation indiscriminately would lead to the extinction of several such trees which have a potential in production of several life saving medications. Thus, passing of laws will aid in the preservation of similar trees whose potential is yet to be determined.
But again, this cannot be true for all nations. For countries that are very poor they might be having a surplus amount of forests in their areas. Thus, in those countries preservation would not aid much. Thus, considering those cases, it would rather wise to clear a certain amount of vegetation for economic gain. But again, there remains an ambiguity so as to what amount of vegetation can be cleared for economic gain.
Thus, in short, considering today's scenario it is important for passing laws which aid in preservation of the wilderness. Because, the wilderness gives us something that outweighs all economic benefits, existence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 66
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 79
- Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing an 50
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 66
- Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Reason: It is inappropriate—and, perhaps, even cruel—to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs a 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...servation of the natural vegetation. Moreover, it is not true that economic gain can ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... forests in their areas. Thus, in those countries preservation would not aid much. Thus, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 354, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
.... But again, there remains an ambiguity so as to what amount of vegetation can be cleare...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in short', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225152129817 0.240241500013 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.158215010142 0.157235817809 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101419878296 0.0880659088768 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0872210953347 0.0497285424764 175% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0243407707911 0.0444667217837 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113590263692 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0588235294118 0.0406280797675 145% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88133642996 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0182555780933 0.030933414821 59% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0892494929006 0.0997080785238 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0243407707911 0.0249443105267 98% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0243407707911 0.0148568991511 164% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2727.0 2732.02544248 100% => OK
No of words: 438.0 452.878318584 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.22602739726 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385844748858 0.366273622748 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.296803652968 0.280924506359 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.22602739726 0.200843997647 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.162100456621 0.132149295362 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88133642996 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479452054795 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 53.3068037974 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.52 23.380412469 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1974456849 59.4972553346 56% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.08 141.124799967 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.52 23.380412469 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.48 0.674092028746 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 47.2003652968 51.4728631049 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.47368421053 1.64882698954 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297403389502 0.391690518653 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107812639525 0.123202303941 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0663297235133 0.077325440228 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.484685173326 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.119967817368 0.149214159877 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111872690008 0.161403998019 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045453516283 0.0892212321368 51% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.361038387252 0.385218514788 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.144796185988 0.0692045440612 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206575758689 0.275328986314 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171625192907 0.0653680567796 26% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.