Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The number of female students increased, as the acceptance of gender equality rises. As there is an increase with a female proportion, there is a rising voice for accepting an equal number of genders at universities. Even though the equal number of genders can be expected from having a gender equilibrium, it can create the realistic issues; the number inequalities in certain subjects, and the potential violation of human rights.
Having the equal numbers of genders in a class could enhance the gender equality. By having the equal numbers of genders in every subject can break the stereotype of perceptions in gender image. In the case of scientific related subjects or computer programming subjects can have a stereotype of image of male's predominant subjects. However, by having the gender equalities in those classes could break the image of male predominant or female dominant subjects.
Even though the gender equalities can break the perceptions in some subjects, the reality of having the gender equalities is difficult. Females are usually preferred to study in art or literature related subjects, whereas the mathematic related subjects are preferred by males. The gender equalities in those subjects are impossible to achieve, because the desire for student's career is larger than the perception changes. Therefore, the gender equalities in those subjects would be difficult.
By limiting those options can be seen as the violation of the right of every student can study every subject equally. With the inequality in genders in certain subjects can face the possible closure of lessons if the university only accepts equal numbers of genders in every subject. In other words, mathematic related and literature or art related subjects would be the predominant subjects to be closed down. Therefore, students would not be able to study for their future career.
In conclusion, the gender equality is an ideal perception to be achieved, but it should not be made at universities for the realistic and career reasons. Realistically, students will choose subjects that are related to their future careers and, those preferences in subjects would be separated by the gender differences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Narges.s | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Moaz | 67 | view |
- The line graph shows total bonus payments from April to March by a private sector, financial year ending 2001 to financial year ending 2016 in the UK. 73
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 73
- The Graph below shows the averaged results for one of the two school trials, illustrating the substantial difference in growth rate between egg chickens and meat chickens. 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 73
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in two European countries since 2000 and predicted unemployment rates until 2020. 61
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'in conclusion', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.280839895013 0.247107183377 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.136482939633 0.155533422707 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0892388451444 0.0946595960268 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0314960629921 0.0501214627716 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.010498687664 0.0437548338989 24% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.146981627297 0.122226691241 120% => OK
Participles: 0.0498687664042 0.0403226058552 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87244087277 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0157480314961 0.0326793684256 48% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.128608923885 0.0861772015684 149% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0419947506562 0.021408717616 196% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00262467191601 0.011925033212 22% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2202.0 1933.35771543 114% => OK
No of words: 348.0 316.048096192 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.3275862069 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.451149425287 0.374742101984 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.336206896552 0.28420135186 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.235632183908 0.203846283523 116% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155172413793 0.137316102897 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87244087277 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.037074148 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413793103448 0.56093040696 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.6707501981 60.7387585426 69% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.4705882353 20.7743622355 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6748549104 49.517814964 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.529411765 127.492653851 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 20.7743622355 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.470588235294 0.814263465372 58% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 54.0912778905 49.1944974215 110% => OK
Elegance: 2.67647058824 1.69124875643 158% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205044353056 0.332605444948 62% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.216539258025 0.102741220458 211% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.101845700028 0.0668466124924 152% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.640743227369 0.534860350844 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.1204503433 0.148594505496 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10378936684 0.134430193775 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454222737972 0.0742795772207 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.461148875207 0.324371583561 142% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0483458660688 0.0638462369009 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151020982943 0.228012699653 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04965661358 0.058150111329 85% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.68436873747 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.41683366733 176% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 1.9629258517 306% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.4468937876 144% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.