Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
Right to be informed is a debated topic in this era of communication. Every individual warrants information immediately, more precisely in their fingertips. It is a general belief that the more you know about something the more comfortable you are with it, but people supporting this theory might not agree if a CC camera is in pursuit of their daily activities - that would be an intrusion in their private space.
Applying the same concept for a country, informing every move of the country to the general public might put the country at risk as a whole. Though the citizens might be using the information for a greater good, there is a risk where the information can gain unwanted attention and there might be incidences to stall the moves / motives of the country. For instance, publicizing information of a rocket launch may attract stalling effort from other countries, provided there is some political tensions between the countries.
Most political leaders are immensely talented and have high reputations or are backed with one of the finest minds of the country. A predictive depression in the economy, if publicized might upset a large scale of stock holders and might end up brining down share markets even before the actual depression. Note the word 'predictive'; the depression could have just passed on as a lull period and not a depression, but because of publicizing it, it could lead to a depression immediately. The politicians and their advisors could have taken the necessary steps and the 'predictive' depression wouldn't have happened in the first place.
As people of the country, they shouldn't be hidden from the very basic information or not that the politicians shouldn't be transparent about their paychecks, it is that all information need not be given to the public.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-26 | hyein | 75 | view |
2020-01-23 | jason123 | 62 | view |
2020-01-13 | jason123 | 62 | view |
2019-11-04 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
2019-10-26 | christine_cui | 75 | view |
- Evidence suggests that academic honor codes, which call for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated, are far more successful than are other methods at deterring che 50
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of weather and 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'warrants'' or 'warrant's'?
Suggestion: warrants'; warrant's
... era of communication. Every individual warrants information immediately, more precisely...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...orming every move of the country to the general public might put the country at risk as a whol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 590, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ary steps and the predictive depression wouldnt have happened in the first place. As...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...lace. As people of the country, they shouldnt be hidden from the very basic informati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...information or not that the politicians shouldnt be transparent about their paychecks, i...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'for instance', 'you know', 'in the first place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.22049689441 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.158385093168 0.157235817809 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0869565217391 0.0880659088768 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0434782608696 0.0497285424764 87% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0403726708075 0.0444667217837 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121118012422 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.055900621118 0.0406280797675 138% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88919078756 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0155279503106 0.030933414821 50% => OK
Particles: 0.00621118012422 0.0016655270985 373% => OK
Determiners: 0.145962732919 0.0997080785238 146% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0403726708075 0.0249443105267 162% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00310559006211 0.0148568991511 21% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1796.0 2732.02544248 66% => OK
No of words: 299.0 452.878318584 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00668896321 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.58838876751 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.33779264214 0.366273622748 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270903010033 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207357859532 0.200843997647 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.147157190635 0.132149295362 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88919078756 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 219.290929204 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558528428094 0.48968727796 114% => OK
Word variations: 58.5943315686 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6194690265 53% => OK
Sentence length: 27.1818181818 23.380412469 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.234239898 59.4972553346 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.272727273 141.124799967 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 23.380412469 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.674092028746 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 54.2721191852 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.64102564103 1.64882698954 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356791410887 0.391690518653 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.16627088062 0.123202303941 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0936393570453 0.077325440228 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.660063372699 0.547984918172 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176280532974 0.149214159877 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157509534268 0.161403998019 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798064303089 0.0892212321368 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.275441734284 0.385218514788 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0757021831728 0.0692045440612 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246524285477 0.275328986314 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721686456259 0.0653680567796 110% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.4325221239 29% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 13.5995575221 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.