Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
They aren’t a simple talk to be told neither a secret file to be withhold, when social and national benefit come, political leaders know that the information they are dealing with aren’t any kind of words to be gossiped. Such fragile information with their importance, cannot be given to an audience never safe from third party penetration, neither interfered with unprofessional and unaware thoughts.
Their importance make them fragile, and their content may be of an absolute importance not to only a country, but for a whole nation. Political information isn’t a talk that one could discuss in an afternoon tea. This kind of information which may hold the fate of millions of people isn’t anybody’s game, and shall not be. When politics deal with crucial issues like economics and conflicts all the discussions never have to leave the table and be in the public hands. That’s not how these information should be dealt, and destined. Alas, that is how the credibility of politics is degraded and vanished.
When this degradation occurs, by accepting the fact that everyone must have a hand in serious information that holds our fate, but who is everyone? Whom are we throwing our lives too? Are all our societies filled with patriot citizens whom only intention is the good of their country? The answer is, no. One should always assume the society isn’t a safe zone. Agents, spies and even thieves are eager to get to critical information to achieve their goals in any possible way. The news which are saturated with such information may be a free gift for all those who concern is not only disrupting our lives but our future too.
Lets assume that information are exposed to everyone. Information dealing with politics, economics, societies, and conflicts are at the hand of everyone and everywhere. Despite their content, aren’t these kind of information in need of a total care and awareness in terms of discussion and planning? Aren’t such kind of files vulnerable to any third party force that may alter their direction? In other words, the interfere of the public in such issues may affect the decision-making of the authorities, especially if the public in only aware of a small part of the issue. Moreover, the public with the disparity in experience among its individuals, may affect the course of the country and even its international relations with other people. For example, a referendum may lead to unwanted consequences due to the unawareness of the society in all aspects of politics and economics.
Finally, One must know that political leaders have the total authority to withhold information when there is no safe ground for their availability in public. Keeping in mind that these actions are for everyone’s safety and future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | hyein | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | christine_cui | 75 | view |
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 54
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
They aren't a simple talk to be tol...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nprofessional and unaware thoughts. Their importance make them fragile, and ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
... the public hands. That's not how these information should be dealt, and destined. Alas, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f politics is degraded and vanished. When this degradation occurs, by accepti...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...citizens whom only intention is the good of their country? The answer is, no. One...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...upting our lives but our future too. Lets assume that information are exposed...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 6, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...g our lives but our future too. Lets assume that information are exposed to ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 210, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ere. Despite their content, aren't these kind of information in need of a total care ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 426, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... alter their direction? In other words, the interfere of the public in such issues may affect...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l aspects of politics and economics. Finally, One must know that political le...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r everyone's safety and future.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'third', 'for example', 'kind of', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259597806216 0.240241500013 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.127970749543 0.157235817809 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0767824497258 0.0880659088768 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0347349177331 0.0497285424764 70% => OK
Pronouns: 0.036563071298 0.0444667217837 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.107861060329 0.12292977631 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0292504570384 0.0406280797675 72% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91677280015 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0255941499086 0.030933414821 83% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0987202925046 0.0997080785238 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0255941499086 0.0249443105267 103% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0237659963437 0.0148568991511 160% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2855.0 2732.02544248 105% => OK
No of words: 459.0 452.878318584 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.22004357298 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339869281046 0.366273622748 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.278867102397 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.211328976035 0.200843997647 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.16339869281 0.132149295362 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91677280015 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 219.290929204 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494553376906 0.48968727796 101% => OK
Word variations: 56.3611398494 55.4138127331 102% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.125 23.380412469 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5757819734 59.4972553346 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.958333333 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 23.380412469 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.416666666667 0.674092028746 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.21349557522 211% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 47.0117102397 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.99082568807 1.64882698954 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288329484025 0.391690518653 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129630792102 0.123202303941 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0805944847717 0.077325440228 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.488485823169 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163947856652 0.149214159877 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108210235085 0.161403998019 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586562034789 0.0892212321368 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.332321208898 0.385218514788 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0445410682685 0.0692045440612 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203709549608 0.275328986314 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187212130248 0.0653680567796 29% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.