Nowadays, people live in societies that consumer goods have become cheaper. Do you think the advantages of consumer goods being cheaper outweigh the disadvantages?
In this recent century, the consumer goods are available with a wide range of option where it allows people to purchase goods at cheaper prices. This brings the benefits for people to possess more goods without worrying to make a choice between goods. However, I believe that the disadvantages of cheaper consumer goods outweigh the advantages, because it can lead the society to become materialistic and there are possibilities for people to obtain impulsive purchasing habits which can affect the environment.
The cheaper consumer goods would provide a various options for the public. In other words, people do not have to make a choice between those options, because the price is cheap, they can afford most of goods. The more possession of goods can be available, it can lead to feeling of satisfaction and feeling of security as well as comfortable lifestyles. The comfortable lifestyles which can result in improvement of standard of living. Hence, the consumer goods being cheap can be beneficial for the improvement of living standard and the variety of options to choose from.
On the other hand, the more goods at a cheaper price can lead to materialistic society. If people possess more goods, it can easily form a competition about people's possessions. For example, when people owned a car, other people may try to possess two cars to compete. In the worst case, people judge other person by their materialistic possessions instead of other values. Thus, it can transform the society into materialistic society.
In addition, the impulsive purchasing habits are inevitable. People do not have to buy necessity items, only because all consumer goods are cheap. This impulsive shopping habits can affect a factory to producing of goods excessively and which results in more wastes to the environment. Because more goods are available, people will get easily substitute goods with new one, and this can produce massive amounts of trashes to the environment. Therefore, the impulsive purchasing habits can have a harmful effect to the environment.
In conclusion, the cheaper consumer goods provide a wide range of selections that improves the standard of living, but it causes damages to societal and environmental aspects. It cannot deny that the society can change into materialistic and the environments can be damaged by impulsive purchasing habits. Therefore, the cheaper consumer goods have more of disadvantages than that of advantages.
- Smoking is not only harm the smoker, but also those who nearby. Therefore, smoking should be baned in public places. To what extent do you agre or disagree? 67
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 73
- In many countries today insufficient respect is shown to older people.What do you think may be the reasons for this?What problems might this cause in society? 73
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of th 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'option'?
Suggestion: option
... consumer goods would provide a various options for the public. In other words, people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the goods') or simply say ''most goods''.
Suggestion: most of the goods; most goods
...use the price is cheap, they can afford most of goods. The more possession of goods can be av...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'as well as', 'in other words', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256880733945 0.247107183377 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.130733944954 0.155533422707 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.114678899083 0.0946595960268 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0321100917431 0.0501214627716 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0229357798165 0.0437548338989 52% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119266055046 0.122226691241 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0137614678899 0.0403226058552 34% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.91263083266 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0389908256881 0.0326793684256 119% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.103211009174 0.0861772015684 120% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0435779816514 0.021408717616 204% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0137614678899 0.011925033212 115% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2464.0 1933.35771543 127% => OK
No of words: 392.0 316.048096192 124% => OK
Chars per words: 6.28571428571 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20517956788 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.423469387755 0.374742101984 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.311224489796 0.28420135186 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.196428571429 0.203846283523 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130102040816 0.137316102897 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91263083266 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.037074148 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446428571429 0.56093040696 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.134679264 60.7387585426 78% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0891783567 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.6666666667 20.7743622355 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9085238034 49.517814964 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 127.492653851 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7743622355 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.814263465372 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 49.7891156463 49.1944974215 101% => OK
Elegance: 2.0987654321 1.69124875643 124% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437992402394 0.332605444948 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.131988222234 0.102741220458 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0812794495861 0.0668466124924 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.573923177169 0.534860350844 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.116280047686 0.148594505496 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192718780174 0.134430193775 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114071440505 0.0742795772207 154% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.380192738775 0.324371583561 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0795195083694 0.0638462369009 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32047762915 0.228012699653 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910070295399 0.058150111329 157% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.41683366733 263% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.5751503006 194% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 1.9629258517 306% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 10.4468937876 163% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.