The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.
The chart represents the teachers’ proportions in six different educations from pre-school to university level, dependent on genders in the UK in 2010.
Overall, women had dominant percentages in teaching positions compared to those for men. It is interesting to note that, there was more female teacher occupied in lower educational levels whereas more male teachers were occupied in higher levels of educations.
In terms of female teachers, the highest proportion was found at pre-school level of close to 98%, followed by primary school positions of about 95% and for the secondary and college had the similar proportion of female teachers of below 60%. This proportion decreased as the level of education increased and which rated at the lowest portion of about 25% of female teachers at university.
The proportion of male teachers showed the exact opposite to those of female teachers. The lowest male teachers’ proportion was pre-school and primary school of below 10% each. Meanwhile, about 68% of male teachers maintained at their position at university level as the highest, followed by private training institute had about 58% of male teachers and the male teacher in college was having the same percentage as those of women’s teacher’s portion.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-27 | quynhthi2001 | 67 | view |
2019-11-20 | koinoyokan | 78 | view |
2019-10-12 | Nguyen My | 78 | view |
2019-10-07 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 78 | view |
2019-08-31 | yeu192 | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers. 67
- By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilt of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Some countries are not popular with using a bicycle even though it is beneficial for them. Why?What are the possible solutions to encourage people to use more of bicycle as the main transport? 61
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'second', 'whereas', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.283898305085 0.268076937826 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.10593220339 0.116061578633 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.131355932203 0.0759168565197 173% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0169491525424 0.0366838410393 46% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.00847457627119 0.0131127313244 65% => OK
Prepositions: 0.177966101695 0.155750635184 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0466101694915 0.0379272487307 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.99572612233 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.021186440678 0.0210936926555 100% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0805084745763 0.0948980150116 85% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00423728813559 0.00967000014798 44% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1281.0 1161.00487805 110% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.9 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.405 5.90752243213 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73763899035 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.41 0.337110787985 122% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.335 0.247514529752 135% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.275 0.171178102325 161% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.18 0.112407865282 160% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99572612233 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.546246751206 96% => OK
Word variations: 46.1646652053 49.3433353143 94% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0094962315 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.091877236 42.9750493124 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.125 135.714022679 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.0094962315 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.689975730869 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 58.5 47.7609492067 122% => OK
Elegance: 3.87096774194 2.94281807926 132% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.56892527791 0.418131533498 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.21653388543 0.181151798455 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.121235471327 0.0850326197045 143% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.768279882742 0.706616315825 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158237825922 0.157042692854 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.295268070397 0.228904883108 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120475377072 0.108899403657 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.31757968719 0.367819155151 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.220154248429 0.0812612215331 271% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.384315313548 0.316326947829 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105480799527 0.0921553760075 114% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70731707317 27% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.16585365854 32% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 0.956097560976 209% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.