Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Today, education is as much of a service as it is a business. Even though teachers are paid handsomely for their efforts, such economic halcyon is still indiscernable amongst the people who apply to study at such universities.
Ideally, economic background shouldn't limit access to education. There are numerous examples of people who every year go to MIT and Caltech, improving intellectually, and going on to solve big problems in the world. A significant fraction of such population finds it difficult to pay the skyrocketing tuition fees at such universities of global acclaim, but, owing to financial help, are able to make it through the economic burden.
Being denied the right to education at a good university on the grounds of insufficient funds is indirectly, a violation of the notion that everyone should be able to get good education. A lot of students also end up opting for educational loans, and then have to return a higher sum of money afterwards. Such an economic burden forces the student to live a frugal life, and inadvertently affects his performance at academics.
It is also worthwhile to note that getting an admission into a good university is more herculean than being able to pay the tuition. A student who has made it to a college of their choice does, in certainty, deserve that education.
On the contrary, an academic policy of financial help towards those who are economically not well off may also lead to misuse. Situations like these exist in India, where most colleges offer financial help directly to students of backward castes. However, a lot of general caste people end up getting an admit and then faking their caste status to get tuition waved off. Situations like these are criticised country wide for the grounds of morality. Another argument one can make is that the taxpayer's money, when instead of being used in research is used in such charity calls for anger since the taxpayer never opted for such charity.
All in all, financial help should be provided by the state to students unable to pay their tuition, as such actions help the society as a whole, further championing the stand that anyone who want to develop intellectually should not be discouraged by monetary considerations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | KarinaShine | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | stevewang1007 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
- Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...sities. Ideally, economic background shouldnt limit access to education. There are nu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 302, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... of general caste people end up getting an admit and then faking their caste status to g...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 493, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'taxpayers'' or 'taxpayer's'?
Suggestion: taxpayers'; taxpayer's
...other argument one can make is that the taxpayers money, when instead of being used in re...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'well', 'while', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243309002433 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.160583941606 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0997566909976 0.0880659088768 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0559610705596 0.0497285424764 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0243309002433 0.0444667217837 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119221411192 0.12292977631 97% => OK
Participles: 0.043795620438 0.0406280797675 108% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87756193099 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0486618004866 0.030933414821 157% => OK
Particles: 0.00973236009732 0.0016655270985 584% => OK
Determiners: 0.0997566909976 0.0997080785238 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0121654501217 0.0249443105267 49% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0170316301703 0.0148568991511 115% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2246.0 2732.02544248 82% => OK
No of words: 375.0 452.878318584 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98933333333 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.357333333333 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28 0.280924506359 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.205333333333 0.200843997647 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122666666667 0.132149295362 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87756193099 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562666666667 0.48968727796 115% => OK
Word variations: 64.0034794345 55.4138127331 116% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 23.4375 23.380412469 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9874985792 59.4972553346 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.375 141.124799967 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4375 23.380412469 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6875 0.674092028746 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 51.4375 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.68686868687 1.64882698954 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296139122094 0.391690518653 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0692252826267 0.123202303941 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0365384676389 0.077325440228 47% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.574997955647 0.547984918172 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.168578813635 0.149214159877 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114059801615 0.161403998019 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648810447065 0.0892212321368 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.278254362647 0.385218514788 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0639559839247 0.0692045440612 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186340617325 0.275328986314 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599529233764 0.0653680567796 92% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.