Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others contest those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit. What is your position? Discuss both sides in your response.
In today’s world, there are millions of designs that attract and designate the nature of buildings. As the designs of the buildings became a rising conflict between artists and architecture, the government is the only mediator to resolve this issue. While the artists and architecture are the expertise of their fields and they can produce the harmonious visionary goods, the government can mediate for everyone’s interest. In my opinion, while I understand the beautiful artistic buildings can create beautiful cities, the possibilities of unorganized looking and violation of other people’s rights such as sun lights or views cannot be ignored.
Having the freedom in designing buildings by relevant experts can create beautiful and unique cities. In the case of New York, for example, it is one of the famous artistic cities in the world and now it attracts more than 30 billion of tourists. Now the design in buildings is getting important because it provides the general idea of the business and it provides the entertaining side. Therefore, the beauty in buildings can be used as a tourist attraction and as well as an eye opening feature.
However it cannot deny that the uniqueness in design can mean that the buildings can violate other person’s rights. For example of New York, there are thousands of lawsuits occurring due to violation of sunshine acts, right to light acts and privacy. By constructing the tall skyscrapers according to the owner’s or expert’s designs, it can violate other person’s rights and that can create conflicts. Some countries these violations are not only ending with irritations and conflicts, but it dealt with a violent action. Thus, respect with other person’s rights should be protected.
In conclusion, the designs in constructions are more than just mere beauty. It can make the whole city to be unique just like New York as an artistic city in the world but it also violates other person’s rights and which can involve with various lawsuit cases. Therefore, the government intervention seems to be needed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-26 | jackwings923 | 73 | view |
| 2016-10-06 | Monica1 | 67 | view |
- A society develops the technology in communicating devices rapidly such as smart phones, tablets and other communicating devices. Some people claims that the disadvantages of such device outweigh the advantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- Some countries are not popular with using a bicycle even though it is beneficial for them. Why?What are the possible solutions to encourage people to use more of bicycle as the main transport? 61
- People are living longer than ever before. At the same time, the young population is declining while the number of old people is rising. Will this development be a benefit for the society? What are the advantages and disadvantages of having more old peopl 73
- The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this, decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be ma 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...and as well as an eye opening feature. However it cannot deny that the uniqueness in d...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as well as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259900990099 0.247107183377 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.126237623762 0.155533422707 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0915841584158 0.0946595960268 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0371287128713 0.0501214627716 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0346534653465 0.0437548338989 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116336633663 0.122226691241 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0321782178218 0.0403226058552 80% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.02967281295 2.80594681477 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0148514851485 0.0326793684256 45% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0915841584158 0.0861772015684 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0346534653465 0.021408717616 162% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0049504950495 0.011925033212 42% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2098.0 1933.35771543 109% => OK
No of words: 335.0 316.048096192 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.26268656716 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20517956788 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.411940298507 0.374742101984 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.328358208955 0.28420135186 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.226865671642 0.203846283523 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.167164179104 0.137316102897 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02967281295 2.80594681477 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.037074148 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528358208955 0.56093040696 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 55.8427280457 60.7387585426 92% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.9375 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.32334141 49.517814964 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.125 127.492653851 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9375 0.814263465372 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 53.7733208955 49.1944974215 109% => OK
Elegance: 2.0625 1.69124875643 122% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33622458807 0.332605444948 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129246358486 0.102741220458 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0911816159358 0.0668466124924 136% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.565100164881 0.534860350844 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150731676057 0.148594505496 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148747902886 0.134430193775 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568773549083 0.0742795772207 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.410880877419 0.324371583561 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.106166155782 0.0638462369009 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243220346125 0.228012699653 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543915265445 0.058150111329 94% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 9.0 10.4468937876 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.