do you agree or disagree?playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.
The question is whether playing computer games is a waste of time or not. This view can be affirmed by parents and in their viewpoint the computer games are undeniable fact that destroys the children’s future, conversely I believe that this vantage point is exceedingly scrupulous. If these games are used appropriately, they will play an absolutely crucial role in a spread spectrum in children's life. My arguments and reasons are listed below that strengthen my point of view:
To being with, the computer games will reinforce function of children's mind. The psychologists have recently studied about the relationship between games and kids and then they could provide a noticeable support for this issue. It is incontrovertibly axiomatic that the games create an imagination bed for children; hence the psychologists express that children with a high ratio of imagination are able to produce creative ideas. With regard to this theory, the computer games optimize the mind's performance. Inasmuch the modern world needs to new ideas; consequently the children with creativity ability are in an honorable value.
The second reasons why I advocate this point of view, lies in the fact that computer games can be used in miscellaneous aspects. To elucidate, take a child who decides to play game, on the other hand he is inclined to study. It can be said that the secret of release of this dilemma lies in an adequate schedule. It goes without saying that the presence such a program, will compensate children's gone time due to playing. Nobody could overlook the fact that having a awesome ability for planning and organizing in life, can guide children toward a brilliant future.
Having discussed this issue from this point of view, I'm going to empower it by the following discussion. These types of games provide a paramount objective for children and it is not except delightfulness. Anyone does not such a right to deprive children from being happy. Restricting children will establish reverse consequences as lethargy or defensive mechanism against the study.
By taking all above-mentioned arguments into consideration, the following conclusion could be drawn about this issue. The computer games would have the salient impacts on children’s life and their abilities provided that they are employed in a suitable time by children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 3 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Somayya | 73 | view |
- tpo36 3
- do you agree or disagree?Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life, is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or alone? 88
- some students choose to enter the university immediately after high school however others prefer to take time before beginning the university class Which one is better 70
- tpo19 86
- do you agree or disagree with this sentence?to remain happy and optimistic when you fail is more important than achieving success. 76
Comments
Essay evaluation report
the computer games are undeniable fact
the computer games are an undeniable fact
the computer games are undeniable facts
Anyone does not such a right to deprive
Anyone does not have such a right to deprive
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 378 350
No. of Characters: 1928 1500
No. of Different Words: 200 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.409 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.101 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.873 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 133 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.9 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.718 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.307 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.423 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.042 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
...that strengthen my point of view: To being with, the computer games will reinforce...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'minds'' or 'mind's'?
Suggestion: minds'; mind's
...theory, the computer games optimize the minds performance. Inasmuch the modern world ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 467, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ody could overlook the fact that having a awesome ability for planning and organi...
^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...sed this issue from this point of view, Im going to empower it by the following di...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'conversely', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'with regard to', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.27990430622 0.229887763892 122% => OK
Verbs: 0.165071770335 0.158761421928 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0645933014354 0.0866891130778 75% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0263157894737 0.046263068375 57% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0358851674641 0.0685040099705 52% => OK
Prepositions: 0.131578947368 0.118717715034 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0502392344498 0.0351676179071 143% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.98164002411 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0239234449761 0.0309702414327 77% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.122009569378 0.0887237588012 138% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0287081339713 0.0209618222197 137% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00478468899522 0.0139019557991 34% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2352.0 2387.08602151 99% => OK
No of words: 377.0 408.028673835 92% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23872679045 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48200974243 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.371352785146 0.338922669872 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.310344827586 0.251872472559 123% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.228116710875 0.174417080927 131% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.137931034483 0.112833075102 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98164002411 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541114058355 0.524397521467 103% => OK
Word variations: 60.2209488405 59.2087087015 102% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.8421052632 20.5533526081 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9443811088 48.84282405 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.789473684 120.699889404 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 20.5533526081 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.526315789474 0.644075263715 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 50.8765880218 45.7405998639 111% => OK
Elegance: 2.03157894737 1.45489161554 140% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236342968068 0.300154397459 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0719379731971 0.103427244359 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0390760222566 0.0752933317313 52% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.512356525043 0.497263757937 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.101507232184 0.151897553556 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104177748867 0.114077575197 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085498716234 0.0781384742642 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.300829423895 0.336927656856 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.082654288487 0.067059652881 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163728175975 0.210909579961 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428887762643 0.0618886996521 69% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.86379928315 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 2.4623655914 284% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.