The educational system in each country is a key to advance the country because people who are serving the country as politicians, doctors, lawyers, etc at the first place have been educated in schools. The manner and quality of training each person benefited in the educational system greatly impact on the person's mindset, and as a result on his or her performance. Teachers in the educational system play the utmost important roles which their knowledge and behavior affect students and make their personalities. Nevertheless, sometimes it is declared that teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past in comparison with nowadays. Regarding the behavior of society in my country, I strongly agree with this claim because of two reasons which I will explore them in the following essay.
To begin with, in recent years, the number of teachers has been drastically increased aiming to reduce the pressure on the teachers. In the past, maybe about 50 years ago, the number of students in each class was about 40 because of lacking the trained teachers. However, today, many persons have been trained and employed as teachers in my country, so the number of students in each class has reduced to 15-20 persons. This drastic increase in the number of teachers has made this job less valued and the people in my society think that being a teacher is not worthwhile because everyone that cannot become a doctor or an engineer can become a teacher!!
Secondly, by the drastic increase in the number of teachers, the government has reduced their salary. In consequence, the teachers get paid much less than any other employees even a low-rank clerk in a bank. Thus, when the government neglects teachers and their important roles in advancing the country, how can people perceive the real value of teachers? Unfortunately, in my country due to such viewpoints, talented people are attracted to medical and engineering jobs and they do not like to be a teacher at all. In this case, when the teachers are not very clever and smart, they cannot train creative students who can change the future.
In conclusion, since the basis of each society is its educational system, I contend that the government must pay more attention to the teachers and value their jobs. If the government appreciates the teachers, people subconsciously value teachers and talented people gravitate to this job.
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 86
- During times of economic crisis, which area of spending do you think the government should reduce: education, healthcare or support for the unemployed? 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to su 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ducational system greatly impact on the persons mindset, and as a result on his or her ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'in conclusion', 'as a result', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.2460496614 0.229887763892 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.144469525959 0.158761421928 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0722347629797 0.0866891130778 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0451467268623 0.046263068375 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0428893905192 0.0685040099705 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130925507901 0.118717715034 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0519187358916 0.0351676179071 148% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74249830935 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.020316027088 0.0309702414327 66% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.126410835214 0.0887237588012 142% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0158013544018 0.0209618222197 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0180586907449 0.0139019557991 130% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2405.0 2387.08602151 101% => OK
No of words: 399.0 408.028673835 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02756892231 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388471177945 0.338922669872 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.298245614035 0.251872472559 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.213032581454 0.174417080927 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110275689223 0.112833075102 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74249830935 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498746867168 0.524397521467 95% => OK
Word variations: 54.4990794372 59.2087087015 92% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6684587814 77% => OK
Sentence length: 24.9375 20.5533526081 121% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4195518746 48.84282405 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.3125 120.699889404 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9375 20.5533526081 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 0.644075263715 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 54.7620614035 45.7405998639 120% => OK
Elegance: 1.84466019417 1.45489161554 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379850352494 0.300154397459 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.136762817997 0.103427244359 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0590180096377 0.0752933317313 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.581972295981 0.497263757937 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175042870346 0.151897553556 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184488581404 0.114077575197 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531141221639 0.0781384742642 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.545675882686 0.336927656856 162% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0147944193348 0.067059652881 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285025922561 0.210909579961 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467063666168 0.0618886996521 75% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.