Some people claim that living in big cities is creating difficulties whereas others think it makes easier. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different perspective regarding residing in metropolitan areas. Some people claim that urbanised lifestyles make easier for the residents for the quality of living standards and one’s convenience, whereas others believe that gathering into big cities causes environmental and psychological illness making people’s life more difficult. This essay will discuss both aspects for living in metropolitan areas before reaching a reasonable conclusion.
Some people have a belief that the quality of lifestyles is better in urban areas. Since the urban cities provide various technologies and services for comfortable lifestyles, people can enjoy the comfortable and convenient facilities and services. For instance, the frequent transportation and 24/7 available shopping malls provide the convenient lifestyles where people can commute fast or buy groceries at their convenient times.
Along with this, people can enhance their relationships from surrounded by a lot of people. Usually big cities are gathered by majority of people and this increases the opportunity for human interactions. The more people are surrounded by others there will be more chances to increase social interactions. For example, there are many social events occurring in big cities and majority of them have a purpose of social bonding.
In contrast, some might disagree to live in big cities. The first and foremost reason is the environmental factors. The highly dense populated area creates massive environmental issues such as greenhouse gases, pollution, noise and congestion. Due to all these issues, people suffer various health issues and that can be the reason for the difficulties to reside in cities. Moreover, the urbanised areas are usually having a high competitive market. This competitive environment results in stressful lifestyles. A persistent accumulation of stresses and being exposed to the competitive environments, people would face the risk of psychological distress. In other words, this can result of many negative acts from too much stresses such as crimes, misbehave, distrust, depression, bully and societal isolation.
In my opinion, even though metropolitan areas can provide the quality of technology and services for comfortable residents’ lifestyles, the environmental and psychological aspects cannot be ignored. With all those technological and services cannot recover psychological and environmental damages. Since those damages are taking longer to recover, the difficult urbanised lifestyles should not be favoured. The possession of comfortable lifestyles also cannot be claimed as an easy lifestyle by having all the negative side effects of urbanised lifestyles.
In conclusion, there are different perspectives for residing in big areas. Comfortable lifestyles are the most obvious advantages for living in big cities but the psychological and environmental aspects cannot be forgotten.
- Some people believe that government should spend money on new building rather than renovating existing building. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The following chart illustrates the results of a British survey taken in 2005 related to Housing preferences of UK people. 67
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- The given line chart illustrates the number of people changed between birth and death in Scotland over period 80 years between 1940 and 2020 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most experiences in our lives that seem difficult at the time become valuable lessons for the future. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 718, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...n result of many negative acts from too much stresses such as crimes, misbehave, dis...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2508.0 1615.20841683 155% => OK
No of words: 426.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88732394366 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20508079864 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.561755894193 90% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 506.74238477 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2531841829 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.20833333333 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20852946879 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572643107799 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611687005165 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114981796545 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792233672807 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.