The bar chart illustrates the quantity of male and female in full-time and part-time further education in three periods (1970/71, 1980/81 and 1990/91) in the UK. Units are measured in thousands people.
Overall, enrollment of female student in secondary education increased over a span of twenty years for full-time and part-time education. In the meantime, admission of full-time male students also raised; whereas, admittence of part-time male students fluctuated.
First, looking at the figures of men in further education, it is obvious that the number of part-time studnets were more than full-time students. The quantity male students in part-time education was approximately 1 million in the period of 1970/71 and the number of full-time was over 100 thousand. However, the amount of male students in part-time education dropped to over 800 thousand in 1980/81 before expended to almost 900 thousand in 1990/91.
Turning to the graph of female students, it is evident that the amount of female student in part-time education increased moderately from less than 800 thousand in 1970/71 to more than 800 thousand in 1980/81. Thereafter, the number boomed to nearly 1.1 million in 1990/91.By contrast, the quantity of full-time students rocketed from less than 100 thousand in 1970/71 to more than 200 in 1980/81. Afterward, it continued a sligh increase in 1990/91.
- Using a computer everyday can have more negative than positive effects on young children. Do you agree or disagree? give reasons and relevant examples. 73
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 73
- The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 67
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small number of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss and gi 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart illustrates the quantity o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts are measured in thousands people. Overall, enrollment of female student in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... part-time male students fluctuated. First, looking at the figures of men in ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to almost 900 thousand in 1990/91. Turning to the graph of female students,...
^^^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...boomed to nearly 1.1 million in 1990/91.By contrast, the quantity of full-time stu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, look, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41860465116 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83100350662 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46511627907 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6067189215 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332783723264 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164574437638 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118997291367 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255779441052 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935295076752 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.