It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
To compromise one's beliefs is to give up on principles that one has developed around those beliefs. That is why it is more harmful to give up than to adhere by them. Obviously, one can not have beliefs that challenge the basic morals of day to day life. One can not adhere to principles that allow him to cheat, take bribes or do illicit activities. If your beliefs are those related to philosophy or new ideas, and they get challenged every now and then, than it is good to accept those challenges and support what you believe in.
To begin with, supporting your beliefs provides you with moral grounds and something to look forward to. Your ideas may not be the rudimentary beliefs that every one holds. They might move huge pieces in this society for its betterment. But if they are worth it one shall abide by them as long as possible. If President Obama had given up because of apartheid challenges that his beliefs faced, racism would have still hold firm grounds in United States.
Moreover, the spiritual beliefs help find mental peace in bad times. One might be challenged for his belief in existence of god, but the mere belief is what keeps us going. It motivates us to do good deeds through our day to day life and make other people's life better. If mother Teresa would have compromised her beliefs, one can see what the consequences could have been for the destitute who were saved by her efforts.
Additionally, its not only amoral or spiritual beliefs but the principles that we set in our work-life that shape the path to our future. Several new inventions were once only imaginations, that at some point would have been mocked by the society. If these inventors had stopped believing in them, mankind would have still living the wanderer's life gathering food. If Right Brothers had given up on thinking that man can fly, transportation would have not been the way we know it now.
However, dogmatic principles that hinder the growth or betterment of the society should be given up as soon as possible. In contradiction to what has stated earlier that it is an arduous task to give up on what you have known for years, one can still try to change the way they look at things if they can see the flaw in their principles and there is no way they can exist
in harmony with society for long terms.
Conclusively, it is very important to stick with what you believe in but it is also dangerous to stick by wrong ideas that pose threats to our society. It is better to be judicious and decide what to stand for and what is to let go.
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rat 83
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- You want to sell your television. You think a friend of yours might like to buy it from you. Write a letter to your friend.In your letter:Explain why you are selling the television.Describe the television.Suggest a date when your friend can come and see i 73
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most c 83
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
To compromise ones beliefs is to give up on principles tha...
^^^^
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...y or new ideas, and they get challenged every now and then, than it is good to accept those challe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'held'.
Suggestion: held
... beliefs faced, racism would have still hold firm grounds in United States. Moreove...
^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had compromised'?
Suggestion: had compromised
...r peoples life better. If mother Teresa would have compromised her beliefs, one can see what the conse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 335, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'wanderers'' or 'wanderer's'?
Suggestion: wanderers'; wanderer's
...em, mankind would have still living the wanderers life gathering food. If Right Brothers ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iples and there is no way they can exist in harmony with society for long terms. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2101.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55748373102 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45090893483 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498915401302 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1531538687 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9545454545 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.40909090909 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192788702887 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061755284803 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565978731362 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982705956834 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658514029795 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.