The line graph compares three countries the USA, Sweden and Japan in terms of the percentage of elderly people over a period of 100 years from 1940 to 2040.
Overall, it can be seen that during the period the proportion of elderly people in all the three countries increased. However, Japan shows a dramatic increase when compared to other two countries.
When looking at details, the USA and Sweden show almost similar trend. In the beginning of the period in 1940, the percentage of elderly people in USA and Sweden were almost 9% and 7% respectively. After more than five decades in the late 90s Sweden overcame USA and expected to reach its peak at 25% by the year of 2040. However, in 1980 USA figure touched 15% and it is forecasted that it will remain stable in 15% till 2020. Following this, a sudden increase expecting in USA aged people proportion between 2020 and 2040 and the figure will reach a peak at 23%, by the last year of the period just below to the Sweden.
Although Japans proportion of aged people increased during the period, it shows a different trend. In the initial year of the period, Japans figure for elderly people was only 5%, which is less than the other two countries. Between 1940 and 2000 it dropped to below 5%. But, after the Millenium the aged people percentage in Japan rose dramatically and the projected figure in 2040 will be almost 27%, which is higher than the other two countries.
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 78
- All education and health care should be funded by the government and free for everyone To extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 91
- Governments should make more effort to promote alternative sources of energy. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 67
- traditional values can be wiped out in modern life.some people think that traditional values can be ripped out because of the development of technology. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...casted that it will remain stable in 15% till 2020. Following this, a sudden incr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62992125984 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37160857838 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468503937008 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.283824516 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218588776903 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926555562824 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682188977976 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148678019546 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367319425108 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.