Some people belive that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
Since the disease easily outbreaks nowadays, finding a cure is a vital and hard work for scientists. It is argued between the public that whether using animals testing on human medicines is necessary or not. In my opinion, testing drugs on animals should be ban as it is an act on inhuman.
It is no doubt that using animals to check the safety of human medicines is a medical necessity. Since the early age, animal, namely rabbits and white mouse, have been laboratory testing animals as they have the closest form of ADN to human. These animals are born and raised for the use of science. Therefore, no wild animals are harmed. Furthermore, using the trial cure on them can make sure that there is no side effect on human body. Scientists also guarantee that these animals feel no pain as they have already be paralysed before the process. This method is also more economical than using directly on people. Until an alternative method of testing is found, animals testing is still a possible way to assume the medicine safety.
On the other hand, testing new drugs on animals is an act of inhuman and selfish. People and other animals inhabit the earth together and should be shared the same rights to live. Many medicines and cosmetic products are cruelty-free and still performs excellently on human health as well. Thus, there are many differences between human's ADN and animal's, so we can not fully believe that what perform great on animals works the same on the human. Life is precious, why should we take that risk to save money? Many people agree to pay more money for cruelty-free products so we should invest on the technique that does not involve life risking danger. Personally, I support the idea of banning animals testing products and using the penalty to upgrade laboratories.
In conclusion, using animals to test medicines should be stopped as an act of respect to the mother nature. The government ought to invest more in science to benefit itself as well as the society.
In conclusion, using animals to test medicines should be stopped as an act of respect to the mother nature. The goverments ought to invest more on science to benefit itself as well as the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-14 | q0905780554 | 84 | view |
- Some people belive that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity. Discuss both views and state your own opinion. 73
- A number of tertiary courses require students to undertake a period of unpaid work at an institution or organisation as part of their programme What are the advantages and disadvantages of this type of course requirement 96
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Writ 56
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious polution and uses up the world s fuel resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 39
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'banned'?
Suggestion: banned
...ion, testing drugs on animals should be ban as it is an act on inhuman. It is no...
^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...imals feel no pain as they have already be paralysed before the process. This meth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79736842105 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48481677482 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476315789474 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7728760597 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.8636363636 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255818578978 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840974688953 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704663536819 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145121171196 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457307909325 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.